Jen Psaki
Spokesperson
Daily Press Briefing
Washington, DC
February 3, 2015
INDEX FOR TODAY'S BRIEFING
/…
MIDDLE EAST PEACE
/…
TRANSCRIPT:
1:07 p.m. EST
/…
QUESTION: Palestinian occupied territories.
MS. PSAKI: Sure.
QUESTION: The Israelis withheld again another $100 million of tax – Palestinian tax money. I wonder if you have spoken with them or have you spoken with the Palestinians on this issue on how to release the cash (inaudible)?
MS. PSAKI: We have an ongoing discussion with both the Israelis and the Palestinians. I don’t have any confirmation of what you just stated, but I’m happy to talk to our team about it.
QUESTION: Just a quick follow-up on the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA situation. Now, back on October 12th, the donors agreed to give $5.4 billion on that day, including Qatar and all the donors that were there, including the United States. But Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA said thus far they have not received any of the promise or pledged money. Do you have any comment on that?
MS. PSAKI: Well, the United States has certainly delivered on our commitments —
QUESTION: Right, right. You did.
MS. PSAKI: — and we encouraged every country to deliver on their commitments as well.
QUESTION: Jen, last night the head of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ committee investigating the Gaza flotilla – or, no, sorry – is it the flotilla —
MS. PSAKI: No, Gaza conflict – yes.
QUESTION: — no, Gaza conflict – resigned and Prime Minister Netanyahu said this morning that that resignation should herald the dismantlement of this investigation. Do you agree with that?
MS. PSAKI: Well, we oppose the creation of the commission of inquiry in the first place. So we remain concerned. Given the one-sided nature of the resolution that created the commission of inquiry and the history of the HRC stance on Israel, we still don’t believe that such a mechanism as the commission of inquiry contributes to the shared goal and priority of reaching a sustainable and durable agreement. That has long been – has been consistently our view.
QUESTION: Okay. But I mean, he says that it should be dismantled and gotten rid of completely. Do you agree with that or do you just think that it’s not worthwhile pursuing?
MS. PSAKI: We don’t think it’s the appropriate mechanism.
QUESTION: All right.
MS. PSAKI: I haven’t talked to our team about this dismantlement, but we didn’t support its creation anyway.
QUESTION: Fair enough.
MS. PSAKI: So I think it tells you what —
QUESTION: But on that point, there is a pattern that the Israelis dismiss whatever investigatory effort on their – whatever war that they waged on Gaza or elsewhere. In 2009 they pressured the and it was dismissed. In 2002, they disallowed a commission from going into Jenin, where a massacre —
MS. PSAKI: Well, I just stated, Said, what the position of the United States is. So that was the question, and that’s what I addressed.
QUESTION: I understand. But why would you oppose – why would the United States oppose a Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ commission that is going impartially to investigate crimes that are likely to have been committed?
MS. PSAKI: Because we have concerns about the anti-Israel bias, which we’ve spoken about in the past. We think there’s a range of mechanisms, and this is not the appropriate one.
QUESTION: But when the Israeli prime minister —
MS. PSAKI: I think I’ve addressed the question, Said.
/…
Document Type: Briefing, Press briefing, Transcript
Document Sources: Human Rights Council
Country: United States of America
Subject: Armed conflict, Gaza Strip, Human rights and international humanitarian law, Legal issues
Publication Date: 03/02/2015