{"id":177498,"date":"2004-12-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-03-11T20:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/?p=177498"},"modified":"2019-03-11T20:30:38","modified_gmt":"2019-03-11T20:30:38","slug":"auto-insert-177498","status":"publish","type":"document","link":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/document\/auto-insert-177498\/","title":{"rendered":"Palestine question\/Mideast situation – Compilation of resolutions and decisions adopted in 2004 (English and French)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

<\/p>\n

\n

RESOLUTIONS AND DECISIONS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND THE<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

SECURITY COÄ¢¹½ÊÓƵCIL RELATING TO THE QUESTION OF PALESTINE<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2004<\/strong><\/span> <\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Introductory note<\/u><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1.   At the request of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, the Secretariat prepared, in 1976, a compilation of resolutions and decisions of the General Assembly and the Security Council relating to the question of Palestine adopted from 1947 to 1975 (A\/AC.183\/L.2). <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2.   In 1980, the first addendum was issued (A\/AC.183\/L.2\/Add.1), covering the years 1976 to 1979. Since 1980, addenda 2 to 25 have been prepared by the Secretariat. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3.   The present document, covering action in 2004 by the General Assembly’s fifty-eighth, resumed tenth emergency special and fifty-ninth sessions and the Security Council, is intended to bring the chronological compilation up to date. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

\n<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n


\n<\/span>'<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

GENERAL ASSEMBLY<\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

RESOLUTIONS<\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n
\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

F<\/u><\/strong><\/span>ifty-eighth session<\/u><\/strong><\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Question of Palestine <\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

58\/292.   Status of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  The General Assembly<\/i>,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling<\/i> its resolutions 3237 (XXIX) of 22 November 1974, 43\/177 of 15 December 1988 and 52\/250 of 7 July 1998, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Recalling also<\/i> Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967, 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973, 1397 (2002) of 12 March 2002 and 1515 (2003) of 19 November 2003, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Recalling further<\/i> the relevant provisions of international law, as well as relevant United Nations resolutions, with regard to Israeli settlements and to Occupied East Jerusalem, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Reaffirming <\/i>the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Noting<\/i> that Palestine, in its capacity as observer and pending its attainment of full membership in the United Nations, does not present credentials to the General Assembly, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Affirming <\/i>the need to enable the Palestinian people to exercise sovereignty and to achieve independence in their State, Palestine, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 1.  <\/span> Affirms<\/i><\/span> that the status of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, remains one of military occupation, and affirms, in accordance with the rules and principles of international law and relevant resolutions of the United Nations, including Security Council resolutions, that the Palestinian people have the right to self-determination and to sovereignty over their territory and that Israel, the occupying Power, has only the duties and obligations of an occupying Power under the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949 <\/span>1<\/sup><\/span> <\/span>and the Regulations annexed to the Hague Convention respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, of 1907; <\/span>2<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 2.  Expresses<\/i> its determination<\/i> to contribute to the achievement of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people and the attainment of a just and comprehensive negotiated peace settlement in the Middle East resulting in two viable, sovereign and independent States, Israel and Palestine, based on the pre-1967 borders and living side by side in peace and security. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

87th plenary meeting <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

6 May 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 58\/292: 140-6-11<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Algeria, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Canada, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Ecuador, Egypt, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Paraguay, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Nauru, Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Australia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Peru, Serbia and Montenegro, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

\n

  <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n
\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Resumed tenth emergency special session<\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

ES-10\/15.<\/strong> <\/strong>Advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied<\/strong> Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The General Assembly<\/i>,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Guided<\/i> by the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Considering<\/i> that the promotion of respect for the obligations arising from the Charter and other instruments and rules of international law is among the basic purposes and principles of the United Nations, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling<\/i> its resolution 2625 (XXV) of 24 October 1970, on the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reaffirming<\/i> the illegality of any territorial acquisition resulting from the threat or use of force, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling<\/i><\/span> the Regulations annexed to the Hague Convention Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land of 1907,<\/span>3<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling also<\/i><\/span> the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949,<\/span>4<\/sup><\/span> and relevant provisions of customary law, including those codified in Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, <\/span>5<\/sup><\/span> <\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling further<\/i><\/span> the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,<\/span>6<\/sup><\/span> <\/span>the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights<\/span>4 <\/sup><\/span>and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, <\/span>7<\/sup><\/span><\/a> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reaffirming<\/i> the permanent responsibility of the United Nations towards the question of Palestine until it is resolved in all aspects in a satisfactory manner on the basis of international legitimacy, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling<\/i> relevant Security Council resolutions, including resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967, 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973, 446 (1979) of 22 March 1979, 452 (1979) of 20 July 1979, 465 (1980) of 1 March 1980, 476 (1980) of 30 June 1980, 478 (1980) of 20 August 1980, 904 (1994) of 18 March 1994, 1073 (1996) of 28 September 1996, 1397 (2002) of 12 March 2002, 1515 (2003) of 19 November 2003 and 1544 (2004) of 19 May 2004, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling also<\/i> the resolutions of its tenth emergency special session on illegal Israeli actions in Occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reaffirming <\/i>the most recent resolution of the fifty-eighth session of the General Assembly on the status of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, resolution 58\/292 of 6 May 2004, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reaffirming also <\/i>the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, including their right to their independent State of Palestine, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reaffirming<\/i> further <\/i>the commitment to the two-State solution of Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security within recognized borders, based on the pre-1967 borders, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Condemning<\/i> all acts of violence, terrorism and destruction,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Calling upon<\/i><\/span> both parties to fulfil their obligations under relevant provisions of the road map,<\/span>8<\/sup><\/span> <\/span>the Palestinian Authority to undertake visible efforts on the ground to arrest, disrupt and restrain individuals and groups conducting and planning violent attacks, and the Government of Israel to take no actions undermining trust, including deportations and attacks on civilians and extrajudicial killings, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reaffirming<\/i> that all States have the right and the duty to take actions in conformity with international law and international humanitarian law to counter deadly acts of violence against their civilian population in order to protect the lives of their citizens, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling<\/i> its resolution ES-10\/13 of 21 October 2003, in which it demanded that Israel stop and reverse the construction of the wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling also<\/i> its resolution ES-10\/14 of 8 December 2003, in which it requested the International Court of Justice to urgently render an advisory opinion on the following question: <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

“What are the legal consequences arising from the construction of the wall being built by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, as described in the report of the Secretary-General, considering the rules and principles of intern “What are the legal consequences arising from the construction of the wall being built by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, as described in the report of the Secretary-General, considering the rules and principles of international law, including the Fourth Geneva Convention, of 1949, and relevant Security Council and General Assembly resolutions?”, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Having received<\/i><\/span> <\/span>with respect<\/i><\/span> the advisory opinion of the Court on the <\/span>Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory <\/i><\/span>, rendered on 9 July 2004,<\/span>9<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Noting in particular<\/i><\/span> that the Court replied to the question put forth by the General Assembly in resolution ES-10\/14 as follows:<\/span>10<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

“A.   The construction of the wall being built by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, and its associated regime, are contrary to international law; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

“B.   Israel is under an obligation to terminate its breaches of international law; it is under an obligation to cease forthwith the works of construction of the wall being built in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, to dismantle forthwith the structure therein situated, and to repeal or render ineffective forthwith all legislative and regulatory acts relating thereto, in accordance with paragraph 151 of this Opinion; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

“C.   Israel is under an obligation to make reparation for all damage caused by the construction of the wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

“D.   All States are under an obligation not to recognize the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by such construction; all States Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949 have in addition the obligation, while respecting the United Nations Charter and international law, to ensure compliance by Israel with international humanitarian law as embodied in that Convention; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

“E.   Ä¢¹½ÊÓƵ, and especially the General Assembly and the Security Council, should consider what further action is required to bring to an end the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and the associated regime, taking due account of the present Advisory Opinion.”, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Noting <\/i><\/span>that the Court concluded that “the Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (including East Jerusalem) have been established in breach of international law”,<\/span>11<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Noting also<\/i><\/span> the statement made by the Court that “Israel and Palestine are under an obligation scrupulously to observe the rules of international humanitarian law, one of the paramount purposes of which is to protect civilian life”,<\/span>12<\/sup><\/span> and that “in the Court’s view, this tragic situation can be brought to an end only through implementation in good faith of all relevant Security Council resolutions, in particular resolutions 242 (1967) and 338 (1973)”, <\/span>12<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Considering<\/i> that respect for the Court and its functions is essential to the rule of law and reason in international affairs, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1.  <\/span> Acknowledges <\/i><\/span>the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of 9 July 2004 on the <\/span>Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory <\/i><\/span>,<\/span>9<\/sup><\/span> including in and around East Jerusalem;<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2.  Demands<\/i> that Israel, the occupying Power, comply with its legal obligations as mentioned in the advisory opinion; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3.   Calls upon <\/i>all States Members of the United Nations to comply with their legal obligations as mentioned in the advisory opinion; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

4.  Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to establish a register of damage caused to all natural or legal persons concerned in connection with paragraphs 152 and 153 of the advisory opinion; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

5.  Decides <\/i>to reconvene to assess the implementation of the present resolution, with the aim of ending the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the wall and its associated regime in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

6.  <\/span>Calls upon <\/i><\/span>both the Government of Israel and the Palestinian Authority to immediately implement their obligations under the road map,<\/span>8<\/sup><\/span> in cooperation with the Quartet, as endorsed by Security Council resolution 1515 (2003), to achieve the vision of two States living side by side in peace and security, and emphasizes that both Israel and the Palestinian Authority are under an obligation scrupulously to observe the rules of international humanitarian law; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

7.  <\/span>Calls upon <\/i><\/span>all States parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention<\/span>4<\/sup><\/span> to ensure respect by Israel for the Convention, and invites Switzerland, in its capacity as the depositary of the Geneva Conventions,<\/span>13<\/sup><\/span> <\/span>to conduct consultations and to report to the General Assembly on the matter, including with regard to the possibility of resuming the Conference of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

8.   Decides<\/i> to adjourn the tenth emergency special session temporarily and to authorize the President of the General Assembly at its most recent session to resume its meeting upon request from Member States. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

27th plenary meeting<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

20 July 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION ES\/10-15: 150-6-10<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour <\/u>: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Eritrea, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Australia, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/u><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Cameroon, Canada, El Salvador, Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Kingdom of Tonga, Uganda, Uruguay, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Fifty-ninth session<\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Question of Palestine<\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/28.   Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The General Assembly<\/i>, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling <\/i>its resolutions 181 (II) of 29 November 1947, 194 (III) of 11 December 1948, 3236 (XXIX) of 22 November 1974, 3375 (XXX) and 3376 (XXX) of 10 November 1975, 31\/20 of 24 November 1976 and all subsequent relevant resolutions, including those adopted by the General Assembly at its emergency special sessions and resolution 58\/18 of 3 December 2003, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling also <\/i>its resolution 58\/292 of 6 May 2004,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Having considered <\/i><\/span>the report of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People,<\/span>14<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling <\/i>the mutual recognition between the Government of the State of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, the representative of the Palestinian people, as well as the existing agreements between the two sides and the need for full compliance with those agreements, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling also <\/i><\/span>the Quartet road map to a permanent two-State solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,<\/span>15<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling further <\/i><\/span>the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice on the <\/span>Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory<\/i><\/span>,<\/span>16<\/sup><\/span> and recalling also its resolution ES-10\/15 of 20 July 2004,<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reaffirming <\/i>that the United Nations has a permanent responsibility towards the question of Palestine until the question is resolved in all its aspects in a satisfactory manner in accordance with international legitimacy, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1.  <\/span> Expresses its appreciation <\/i><\/span>to the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People for its efforts in performing the tasks assigned to it by the General Assembly, and takes note of its annual report,<\/span>14<\/sup><\/span> including the conclusions and recommendations contained in chapter VII thereof; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2.  Requests <\/i>the Committee to continue to exert all efforts to promote the realization of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, to support the Middle East peace process and to mobilize international support for and assistance to the Palestinian people, and authorizes the Committee to make such adjustments in its approved programme of work as it may consider appropriate and necessary in the light of developments and to report thereon to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session and thereafter; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3.   Also requests <\/i>the Committee to continue to keep under review the situation relating to the question of Palestine and to report and make suggestions to the General Assembly, the Security Council or the Secretary-General, as appropriate; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

4.   Further requests <\/i>the Committee to continue to extend its cooperation and support to Palestinian and other civil society organizations in order to mobilize international solidarity and support for the achievement by the Palestinian people of its inalienable rights and for a peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine, and to involve additional civil society organizations in its work; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

5.  Requests <\/i>the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine, established under General Assembly resolution 194 (III), and other United Nations bodies associated with the question of Palestine to continue to cooperate fully with the Committee and to make available to it, at its request, the relevant information and documentation which they have at their disposal; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

6.  Invites <\/i>all Governments and organizations to extend their cooperation to the Committee in the performance of its tasks; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

7.  Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to circulate the report of the Committee to all the competent bodies of the United Nations, and urges them to take the necessary action, as appropriate; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

8.  Also requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to continue to provide the Committee with all the necessary facilities for the performance of its tasks. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

64th plenary meeting<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/28: 104-7-63<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Colombia, Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Cuba, Cyprus, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Djibouti, Dominica, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Philippines, Qatar, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Somalia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Australia, Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Burundi, Cameroon, Costa Rica, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Monaco, Nauru, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Samoa, San Marino, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Tonga, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Uruguay, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/29. Division for Palestinian Rights of the Secretariat<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  The General Assembly<\/i>,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Having considered <\/i><\/span>the report of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People,<\/span>17<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Taking note in particular <\/i>of the relevant information contained in chapter V.B of that report, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i>its resolution 32\/40 B of 2 December 1977 and all subsequent relevant resolutions, including resolution 58\/19 of 3 December 2003, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 1.   Notes with appreciation <\/i>the action taken by the Secretary-General in compliance with its resolution 58\/19; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 2.   Considers <\/i>that the Division for Palestinian Rights of the Secretariat continues to make a useful and constructive contribution; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 3.   Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to continue to provide the Division with the necessary resources and to ensure that it continues to carry out its programme of work as detailed in the relevant earlier resolutions, in consultation with the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People and under its guidance, including, in particular, the organization of meetings in various regions with the participation of all sectors of the international community, the further development and expansion of the documents collection of the United Nations Information System on the Question of Palestine, the preparation and widest possible dissemination of publications and information materials on various aspects of the question of Palestine and the provision of the annual training programme for staff of the Palestinian Authority; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 4.   Also requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to ensure the continued cooperation of the Department of Public Information and other units of the Secretariat in enabling the Division to perform its tasks and in covering adequately the various aspects of the question of Palestine; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 5.   Invites <\/i>all Governments and organizations to extend their cooperation to the Division in the performance of its tasks; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 6.   Requests <\/i>the Committee and the Division, as part of the observance of the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People on 29 November, to continue to organize an annual exhibit on Palestinian rights or a cultural event in cooperation with the Permanent Observer Mission of Palestine to the United Nations, and encourages Member States to continue to give the widest support and publicity to the observance of the Day of Solidarity. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

64th plenary meeting <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/29: 103-8-64<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u>: Afghanistan, Algeria, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Colombia, Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Cuba, Cyprus, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Djibouti, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Philippines, Qatar, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Somalia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Australia, Grenada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Nauru, Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Burundi, Cameroon, Canada, Costa Rica, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Monaco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Samoa, San Marino, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Tonga, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/30.   Special information programme on the question of Palestine of the Department of Public Information of the Secretariat<\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 The General Assembly<\/i>, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Having considered<\/i><\/span> the report of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People,<\/span>18<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Taking note in particular<\/i> of the information contained in chapter VI of that report,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling<\/i> its resolution 58\/20 of 3 December 2003,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Convinced<\/i> that the worldwide dissemination of accurate and comprehensive information and the role of civil society organizations and institutions remain of vital importance in heightening awareness of and support for the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i>the mutual recognition between the Government of the State of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, the representative of the Palestinian people, as well as the existing agreements between the two sides and the need for full compliance with those agreements, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Recalling also<\/i><\/span> the Quartet road map to a permanent two-State solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,<\/span>19<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Taking note<\/i><\/span> of the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice on the <\/span>Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory<\/i><\/span>,<\/span>20<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 1.   Notes with appreciation<\/i> the action taken by the Department of Public Information of the Secretariat in compliance with resolution 58\/20; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 2.   Considers<\/i> that the special information programme on the question of Palestine of the Department is very useful in raising the awareness of the international community concerning the question of Palestine and the situation in the Middle East and that the programme is contributing effectively to an atmosphere conducive to dialogue and supportive of the peace process; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 3.   Requests<\/i> the Department, in full cooperation and coordination with the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, to continue, with the necessary flexibility as may be required by developments affecting the question of Palestine, its special information programme for the biennium 2004–2005, in particular: <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 (a<\/i>)   To disseminate information on all the activities of the United Nations system relating to the question of Palestine, including reports on the work carried out by the relevant United Nations organizations; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 (b<\/i>)   To continue to issue and update publications on the various aspects of the question of Palestine in all fields, including materials concerning the recent developments in that regard, in particular the prospects for peace; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 (c<\/i>)   To expand its collection of audio-visual material on the question of Palestine and to continue the production and preservation of such material and the updating of the exhibit in the Secretariat; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 (d<\/i>)   To organize and promote fact-finding news missions for journalists to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 (e<\/i>)   To organize international, regional and national seminars or encounters for journalists, aiming in particular at sensitizing public opinion to the question of Palestine; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 (f<\/i>)   To continue to provide assistance to the Palestinian people in the field of media development, in particular to strengthen the training programme for Palestinian broadcasters and journalists initiated in 1995. <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

64th plenary meeting <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1 December 2004<\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/30: 162-7-9<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Grenada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Nauru, Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Australia, Cameroon, Haiti, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Uganda, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/31. Peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The General Assembly<\/i>,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling <\/i>its relevant resolutions, including those adopted at the tenth emergency special session, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling also <\/i>its resolution 58\/292 of 6 May 2004,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling further <\/i>the relevant Security Council resolutions, including resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967, 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973, 1397 (2002) of 12 March 2002, 1515 (2003) of 19 November 2003 and 1544 (2004) of 19 May 2004, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Welcoming <\/i>the affirmation by the Security Council of the vision of a region where two States, Israel and Palestine, live side by side within secure and recognized borders, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Noting with concern <\/i>that it has been fifty-seven years since the adoption of resolution 181 (II) of 29 November 1947 and thirty-seven years since the occupation of Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, in 1967, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Having considered <\/i><\/span>the report of the Secretary-General submitted pursuant to the request made in its resolution 58\/21 of 3 December 2003,<\/span>21<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reaffirming <\/i>the permanent responsibility of the United Nations with regard to the question of Palestine until the question is resolved in all its aspects in accordance with international law, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling <\/i><\/span>the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice on the <\/span>Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory<\/i><\/span>,<\/span>22<\/sup><\/span> and recalling also its resolution ES-10\/15 of 20 July 2004,<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Convinced <\/i>that achieving a final and peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine, the core of the Arab-Israeli conflict, is imperative for the attainment of comprehensive and lasting peace and stability in the Middle East, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Aware <\/i>that the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples is among the purposes and principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Affirming <\/i>the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling <\/i>its resolution 2625 (XXV) of 24 October 1970,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reaffirming <\/i>the illegality of the Israeli settlements in the territory occupied since 1967 and of Israeli actions aimed at changing the status of Jerusalem, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reaffirming also <\/i>that the construction by Israel, the occupying Power, of a wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, and its associated regime, are contrary to international law, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Affirming once again <\/i>the right of all States in the region to live in peace within secure and internationally recognized borders, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling <\/i><\/span>the mutual recognition between the Government of the State of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, the representative of the Palestinian people,<\/span>23<\/sup><\/span> <\/span>and the agreements concluded between the two sides, and the need for full compliance with those agreements, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling also <\/i><\/span>the endorsement by the Security Council, in resolution 1515 (2003), of the Quartet road map to a permanent two-State solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,<\/span>24<\/sup><\/span> and stressing the urgent need for its implementation and compliance with its provisions, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Noting <\/i>the establishment of the Palestinian Authority, and recognizing the urgent need to rebuild, reform and strengthen its damaged institutions, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Welcoming <\/i>the contribution to the peace process of the United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process and Personal Representative of the Secretary-General to the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority, including in the framework of the activities of the Quartet, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Welcoming also <\/i>the convening of international donor meetings, as well as the establishment of international mechanisms to provide assistance to the Palestinian people, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Expressing its grave concern <\/i>over the tragic events in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, since 28 September 2000 and the continuing deterioration of the situation, including the rising number of deaths and injuries, mostly among Palestinian civilians, the deepening humanitarian crisis facing the Palestinian people and the widespread destruction of Palestinian property and infrastructure, both private and public, including institutions of the Palestinian Authority, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Expressing its grave concern also <\/i>over the repeated military actions in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and the reoccupation of Palestinian population centres by the Israeli occupying forces, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Emphasizing <\/i>the importance of the safety and well-being of all civilians in the whole Middle East region, and condemning all acts of violence and terror against civilians on both sides, including the suicide bombings, the extrajudicial executions and the excessive use of force, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gravely concerned <\/i>over the increased suffering and casualties on both the Palestinian and Israeli sides, the loss of confidence on both sides and the dire situation facing the Middle East peace process, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Aware <\/i>of the urgent need for revitalized and active international involvement to support both parties in overcoming the current dangerous impasse in the peace process, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Affirming <\/i>the urgent need for the parties to cooperate with all international efforts, including the efforts of the Quartet, to end the current tragic situation and to resume and accelerate negotiations towards a final peace settlement, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Welcoming <\/i>the initiatives and efforts undertaken by civil society in pursuit of a peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Taking note <\/i><\/span>of the findings by the International Court of Justice, in its advisory opinion, including on the urgent necessity for the United Nations as a whole to redouble its efforts to bring the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which continues to pose a threat to international peace and security, to a speedy conclusion, thereby establishing a just and lasting peace in the region,<\/span>25<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1.  Reaffirms <\/i>the necessity of achieving a peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine, the core of the Arab-Israeli conflict, in all its aspects, and of intensifying all efforts towards that end; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2.   Reaffirms its full support<\/i> for the Middle East peace process, which began in Madrid, and the existing agreements between the Israeli and Palestinian sides, stresses the necessity for the establishment of a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East, and welcomes in this regard the ongoing efforts of the Quartet; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3.  <\/span>Welcomes <\/i><\/span>the Arab Peace Initiative adopted by the Council of the League of Arab States at its fourteenth session, held in Beirut on 27 and 28 March 2002;<\/span>26<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

4.  <\/span>Calls upon <\/i><\/span>both parties to fulfil their obligations in implementation of the road map <\/span>24<\/sup><\/span> by taking parallel and reciprocal steps in this regard, and stresses the importance and urgency of establishing a credible and effective third-party monitoring mechanism including all members of the Quartet; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

5.  Stresses <\/i>the need for a speedy end to the reoccupation of Palestinian population centres and for the complete cessation of all acts of violence, including military attacks, destruction and acts of terror; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

6.   Calls upon <\/i>the parties, with the support of the Quartet and other interested parties, to exert all efforts necessary to halt the deterioration of the situation, to reverse all measures taken on the ground since 28 September 2000 and to facilitate a speedy resumption of the peace process and the conclusion of a final peaceful settlement; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

7.  <\/span>Demands <\/i><\/span>that Israel, the occupying Power, comply with its legal obligations, as mentioned in the advisory opinion,<\/span>22<\/sup><\/span> and calls upon all States Members of the United Nations to comply with their legal obligations as mentioned in the advisory opinion; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

8.   Reaffirms its commitment<\/i> , in accordance with international law, to the two-State solution of Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security within recognized borders, based on the pre-1967 borders; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

9.   Reiterates its demand <\/i>for the complete cessation of all Israeli settlement activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan, and calls for the implementation of the relevant Security Council resolutions; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

10.  Stresses <\/i>the need for:<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

(a <\/i>)   The withdrawal of Israel from the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

(b<\/i>)   The realization of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, primarily the right to self-determination and the right to their independent State; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

11.   Also stresses <\/i>the need for resolving the problem of the Palestine refugees in conformity with its resolution 194 (III) of 11 December 1948; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

12.  Urges <\/i>Member States to expedite the provision of economic, humanitarian and technical assistance to the Palestinian people and the Palestinian Authority during this critical period to help to alleviate the suffering of the Palestinian people, rebuild the Palestinian economy and infrastructure and support the restructuring and reform of Palestinian institutions; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

13.  Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to continue his efforts with the parties concerned, and in consultation with the Security Council, towards the attainment of a peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine and the promotion of peace in the region and to submit to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session a report on these efforts and on developments on this matter. <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

64th plenary meeting <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1 December 2004<\/i> <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/31: 161-7-10<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federatio n, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Australia, Grenada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Cameroon, Haiti, Honduras, Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Uganda, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The situation in the Middle East <\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

59\/32. Jerusalem<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 The General Assembly<\/i>, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i>its resolution 181 (II) of 29 November 1947, in particular its provisions regarding the City of Jerusalem, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Recalling also<\/i> its resolution 36\/120 E of 10 December 1981 and all subsequent resolutions, including resolution 56\/31 of 3 December 2001, in which it, inter alia, determined that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purported to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, in particular the so-called “Basic Law” on Jerusalem and the proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, were null and void and must be rescinded forthwith, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Recalling further<\/i> Security Council resolutions relevant to Jerusalem, including resolution 478 (1980) of 20 August 1980, in which the Council, inter alia, decided not to recognize the “Basic Law” and called upon those States which had established diplomatic missions in Jerusalem to withdraw such missions from the Holy City, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling <\/i><\/span>the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice on the <\/span>Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory<\/i><\/span>,<\/span>27 <\/sup><\/span> and recalling resolution ES-10\/15 of 20 July 2004, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Expressing its grave concern<\/i> at any action taken by any body, governmental or non-governmental, in violation of the above-mentioned resolutions, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Reaffirming <\/i>that the international community, through the United Nations, has a legitimate interest in the question of the City of Jerusalem and the protection of the unique spiritual, religious and cultural dimensions of the city, as foreseen in relevant United Nations resolutions on this matter, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Having considered<\/i><\/span> the report of the Secretary-General,<\/span>28<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 1.   Reiterates its determination<\/i> that any actions taken by Israel to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the Holy City of Jerusalem are illegal and therefore null and void and have no validity whatsoever; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 2.   Deplores<\/i> the transfer by some States of their diplomatic missions to Jerusalem in violation of Security Council resolution 478 (1980), and calls once more upon those States to abide by the provisions of the relevant United Nations resolutions, in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 3.   Stresses<\/i> that a comprehensive, just and lasting solution to the question of the City of Jerusalem should take into account the legitimate concerns of both the Palestinian and Israeli sides and should include internationally guaranteed provisions to ensure the freedom of religion and of conscience of its inhabitants, as well as permanent, free and unhindered access to the holy places by the people of all religions and nationalities; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

4.  Requests<\/i> the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session on the implementation of the present resolution. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

64th plenary meeting<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/32: 155-7-15<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin. Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Colombia, Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Costa Rica, Grenada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Albania, Cameroon, El Salvador, Fiji, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Kenya, Nauru, Nicaragua, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/33. The Syrian Golan<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 The General Assembly<\/i>, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Having considered <\/i>the item entitled “The situation in the Middle East”,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Taking note <\/i><\/span>of the report of the Secretary-General,<\/span>29<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i>Security Council resolution 497 (1981) of 17 December 1981,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Reaffirming <\/i>the fundamental principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force, in accordance with international law and the Charter of the United Nations, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Reaffirming once more <\/i><\/span>the applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>30<\/sup><\/span> to the occupied Syrian Golan,<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Deeply concerned <\/i>that Israel has not withdrawn from the Syrian Golan, which has been under occupation since 1967, contrary to the relevant Security Council and General Assembly resolutions, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Stressing <\/i>the illegality of the Israeli settlement construction and other activities in the occupied Syrian Golan since 1967, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Noting with satisfaction <\/i>the convening in Madrid on 30 October 1991 of the Peace Conference on the Middle East, on the basis of Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967, 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973 and 425 (1978) of 19 March 1978 and the formula of land for peace, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Expressing grave concern <\/i>over the halt in the peace process on the Syrian track, and expressing the hope that peace talks will soon resume from the point they had reached, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 1.   Declares <\/i>that Israel has failed so far to comply with Security Council resolution 497 (1981); <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 2.   Also declares <\/i>that the Israeli decision of 14 December 1981 to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the occupied Syrian Golan is null and void and has no validity whatsoever, as confirmed by the Security Council in its resolution 497 (1981), and calls upon Israel to rescind it; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 3.  <\/span> Reaffirms its determination <\/i><\/span>that all relevant provisions of the Regulations annexed to the Hague Convention of 1907,<\/span>31<\/sup><\/span> <\/span> and the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, <\/span>2<\/sup><\/span> continue to apply to the Syrian territory occupied by Israel since 1967, and calls upon the parties thereto to respect and ensure respect for their obligations under those instruments in all circumstances; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 4.   Determines once more <\/i>that the continued occupation of the Syrian Golan and its de facto annexation constitute a stumbling block in the way of achieving a just, comprehensive and lasting peace in the region; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 5.   Calls upon <\/i>Israel to resume the talks on the Syrian and Lebanese tracks and to respect the commitments and undertakings reached during the previous talks; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 6.   Demands once more <\/i>that Israel withdraw from all the occupied Syrian Golan to the line of 4 June 1967 in implementation of the relevant Security Council resolutions; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 7.   Calls upon <\/i>all the parties concerned, the co-sponsors of the peace process and the entire international community to exert all the necessary efforts to ensure the resumption of the peace process and its success by implementing Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) and 338 (1973); <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 8.  Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session on the implementation of the present resolution. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

64th plenary meeting<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1 <\/i>December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/33: 111-6-60<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Colombia, Côte d'Ivoire, Cuba, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Djibouti, Dominica, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Philippines, Qatar, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Somalia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Grenada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Albania, Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Burundi, Cameroon, Canada, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Nauru, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Samoa, San Marino, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Tonga, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Uruguay, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East <\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/117.   Assistance to Palestine refugees<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The General Assembly<\/i>,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling<\/i> its resolution 194 (III) of 11 December 1948 and all its subsequent resolutions on the question, including resolution 58\/91 of 9 December 2003, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling also<\/i> its resolution 302 (IV) of 8 December 1949, by which, inter alia, it established the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling further <\/i>relevant Security Council resolutions,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Aware<\/i> of the fact that, for more than five decades, the Palestine refugees have suffered from the loss of their homes, lands and means of livelihood, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Affirming<\/i> the imperative of resolving the problem of the Palestine refugees for the achievement of justice and for the achievement of lasting peace in the region, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Acknowledging<\/i> the essential role that the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East has played for more than fifty-four years since its establishment in ameliorating the plight of the Palestine refugees in the fields of education, health and relief and social services, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Taking note<\/i><\/span> of the report of the Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East covering the period from 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004,<\/span>32<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Aware<\/i> of the continuing needs of the Palestine refugees throughout all the fields of operation, namely Jordan, Lebanon, the Syrian Arab Republic and the Occupied Palestinian Territory, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Expressing grave concern <\/i>at the especially difficult situation of the Palestine refugees under occupation, including with regard to their safety, well-being and living conditions, and the continuous deterioration of those conditions during the recent period, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Noting<\/i><\/span> the signing of the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements on 13 September 1993 by the Government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization<\/span>33<\/sup><\/span> and the subsequent implementation agreements,<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Aware<\/i> of the important role to be played in the peace process by the Multilateral Working Group on Refugees of the Middle East peace process, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1.   Notes with regret<\/i> that repatriation or compensation of the refugees, as provided for in paragraph 11 of General Assembly resolution 194 (III), has not yet been effected and that, therefore, the situation of the Palestine refugees continues to be a matter of grave concern; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2.   Also notes with regret<\/i> that the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine has been unable to find a means of achieving progress in the implementation of paragraph 11 of General Assembly resolution 194 (III), and requests the Conciliation Commission to exert continued efforts towards the implementation of that paragraph and to report to the Assembly as appropriate, but no later than 1 September 2005; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3.  Affirms <\/i>the necessity for the continuation of the work of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East and the importance of its operation and its services for the well-being of the Palestine refugees and for the stability of the region, pending the resolution of the question of the Palestine refugees; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

4.  Calls upon <\/i>all donors to continue to make the most generous efforts possible to meet the anticipated needs of the Agency, including those mentioned in recent emergency appeals; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

5.  Decides <\/i>to extend the mandate of the Agency until 30 June 2008, without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph 11 of General Assembly resolution 194 (III). <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

71st plenary meeting <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

10 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/117: 167-1-11<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u>: Israel<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Cameroon, Grenada, Haiti, Honduras, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, Papua New Guinea, Tuvalu, United States of America, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/118. Persons displaced as a result of the June 1967 and subsequent hostilities <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The General Assembly<\/i>,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling<\/i> its resolutions 2252 (ES-V) of 4 July 1967, 2341 B (XXII) of 19 December 1967 and all subsequent related resolutions, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling also<\/i> Security Council resolutions 237 (1967) of 14 June 1967 and 259 (1968) of 27 September 1968, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Taking note<\/i><\/span> of the report of the Secretary-General submitted in pursuance of its resolution 58\/92 of 9 December 2003,<\/span>34<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Taking note also<\/i><\/span> of the report of the Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East covering the period from 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004,<\/span>35<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Concerned<\/i> about the continuing human suffering resulting from the June 1967 and subsequent hostilities, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Taking note<\/i><\/span> of the relevant provisions of the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements of 1993<\/span>36<\/sup><\/span> <\/span>with regard to the modalities for the admission of persons displaced in 1967, and concerned that the process agreed upon has not yet been effected, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1.   Reaffirms<\/i> the right of all persons displaced as a result of the June 1967 and subsequent hostilities to return to their homes or former places of residence in the territories occupied by Israel since 1967; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2.  <\/span> Expresses deep concern<\/i><\/span> that the mechanism agreed upon by the parties in article XII of the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements of 1993<\/span>36<\/sup><\/span> on the return of displaced persons has not been complied with, and stresses the necessity for an accelerated return of displaced persons; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3.  Endorses <\/i>, in the meanwhile, the efforts of the Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East to continue to provide humanitarian assistance, as far as practicable, on an emergency basis, and as a temporary measure, to persons in the area who are currently displaced and in serious need of continued assistance as a result of the June 1967 and subsequent hostilities; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

4.   Strongly appeals<\/i> to all Governments and to organizations and individuals to contribute generously to the Agency and to the other intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations concerned for the above-mentioned purposes; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

5.  Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General, after consulting with the Commissioner-General, to report to the General Assembly before its sixtieth session on the progress made with regard to the implementation of the present resolution. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

    <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

71st plenary meeting<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

10 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/118: 162-6-9<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Grenada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Haiti, Honduras, Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Tuvalu, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/119. Operations of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The General Assembly<\/i>,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling<\/i> its resolutions 194 (III) of 11 December 1948, 212 (III) of 19 November 1948, 302 (IV) of 8 December 1949 and all subsequent related resolutions, including resolution 58\/93 of 9 December 2003, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling also<\/i> the relevant Security Council resolutions,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Having considered<\/i><\/span> the report of the Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East covering the period from 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004,<\/span>37<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Taking note<\/i><\/span> of the letter dated 30 September 2004 from the Chairperson of the Advisory Commission of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East addressed to the Commissioner-General,<\/span>38<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Deeply concerned<\/i> about the continuing critical financial situation of the Agency and its effect on the continuing provision of necessary Agency services to the Palestine refugees, including its emergency-related and development programmes, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling<\/i><\/span> Articles 100, 104 and 105 of the Charter of the United Nations and the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations,<\/span>39<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling also<\/i><\/span> the Convention on the Safety of United Nations and Associated Personnel,<\/span>40<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Affirming<\/i><\/span> the applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>41<\/sup><\/span> to the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Aware<\/i> of the continuing needs of the Palestine refugees throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory and in the other fields of operation, namely, in Jordan, Lebanon and the Syrian Arab Republic, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gravely concerned<\/i> about the increased suffering of the Palestine refugees, including that resulting from loss of life, injury and extensive destruction and damage to their shelters and properties, during the ongoing crisis in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Expressing grave concern <\/i>about the grave impact of the events that occurred in the Jenin refugee camp in April 2002, the Rafah refugee camp in May 2004 and the Jabaliya refugee camp in October 2004, including the loss of life, injury, destruction and displacement inflicted on many of the civilian inhabitants, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Aware<\/i> of the extraordinary efforts being undertaken by the Agency for the repair or rebuilding of thousands of damaged or destroyed refugee shelters, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Aware also<\/i> of the valuable work done by the refugee affairs officers of the Agency in providing protection to the Palestinian people, in particular Palestine refugees, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gravely concerned<\/i> about the endangerment of the safety of the Agency’s staff and about the damage caused to facilities of the Agency as a result of Israeli military operations during the reporting period, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Deploring<\/i> the killing of twelve Agency staff members by the Israeli occupying forces since September 2000, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Deploring also<\/i> the killing and wounding of children in the Agency’s schools by the Israeli occupying forces, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Expressing deep concern<\/i> about the continuing policies of closure and severe restrictions, including the curfews, that have been imposed on the movement of persons and goods throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and which have had a grave impact on the socio-economic situation of the Palestine refugees and have greatly contributed to the dire humanitarian crisis facing the Palestinian people, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Deeply concerned<\/i> about the continuing imposition of restrictions on the freedom of movement of the Agency’s staff, vehicles and goods, the harassment and intimidation of the Agency’s staff and the serious accusations made against the Agency, which proved to be unfounded, all of which undermine and obstruct the Agency’s work, including its ability to provide its essential services, notably its education, health and relief and social services, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling<\/i><\/span> the signing, on 13 September 1993, of the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements by the Government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization<\/span>42<\/sup><\/span> and the subsequent implementation agreements,<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Aware<\/i> of the agreement between the Agency and the Government of Israel,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Taking note<\/i><\/span> of the agreement reached on 24 June 1994, embodied in an exchange of letters between the Agency and the Palestine Liberation Organization,<\/span>43<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1.  Expresses its appreciation<\/i> to the Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, as well as to all of the staff of the Agency, for their tireless efforts and valuable work, particularly in the light of the increasingly difficult conditions during the past year; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2.   Also expresses its appreciation<\/i> to the Advisory Commission of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, and requests it to continue its efforts and to keep the General Assembly informed of its activities, including the full implementation of Assembly decision 48\/417 of 10 December 1993; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3.  <\/span> Takes note with appreciation<\/i><\/span> of the report of the Working Group on the Financing of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East<\/span>44<\/sup><\/span> and the efforts of the Working Group to assist in ensuring the financial security of the Agency, and requests the Secretary-General to provide the necessary services and assistance to the Working Group for the conduct of its work; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

4.  <\/span>Commends<\/i><\/span> the continuing efforts of the Commissioner-General to increase the budgetary transparency and efficiency of the Agency, as reflected in the Agency’s programme budget for the biennium 2004–2005;<\/span>45<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

5.  Acknowledges<\/i> the support provided by the host Governments to the Agency in the discharge of its duties; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

6.  Welcomes<\/i> the convening, on 7 and 8 June 2004, of the Geneva conference by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation to increase support for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

7.  <\/span>Encourages<\/i><\/span> the Agency’s further consideration of the needs and rights of children in its operations in accordance with the Convention on the Rights of the Child;<\/span>46<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

8.  Expresses concern<\/i> about the temporary relocation of the headquarters international staff of the Agency from Gaza City and the disruption of operations at the headquarters; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

9.  <\/span>Calls upon<\/i><\/span> Israel, the occupying Power, to comply fully with the provisions of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949;<\/span>41<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

10.  <\/span> Also calls upon<\/i><\/span> Israel to abide by Articles 100, 104 and 105 of the Charter of the United Nations and the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations<\/span>39<\/sup><\/span> in order to ensure the safety of the personnel of the Agency, the protection of its institutions and the safeguarding of the security of its facilities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

11.  Urges<\/i> the Government of Israel speedily to compensate the Agency for damage to its property and facilities resulting from actions by the Israeli side, particularly during the reporting period; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

12.  Calls upon<\/i> Israel particularly to cease obstructing the movement of the staff, vehicles and supplies of the Agency and to cease the levying of extra fees and charges, which affect the Agency’s operations detrimentally; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

13.  Requests<\/i> the Commissioner-General to proceed with the issuance of identification cards for Palestine refugees and their descendants in the Occupied Palestinian Territory; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

14.  Affirms<\/i> that the functioning of the Agency remains essential in all fields of operation; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

15.  Notes<\/i> the success of the Agency’s microfinance and microenterprise programme, and calls upon the Agency, in close cooperation with the relevant agencies, to continue to contribute to the development of the economic and social stability of the Palestine refugees in all fields of operation; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

16.   Reiterates its request<\/i> to the Commissioner-General to proceed with the modernization of the archives of the Agency through the Palestine Refugee Records Project, and to indicate the progress made in this regard in his report to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

17.   Reiterates its previous appeals<\/i> to all States, specialized agencies and non-governmental organizations to continue and to augment the special allocations for grants and scholarships for higher education to Palestine refugees in addition to their contributions to the regular budget of the Agency and to contribute to the establishment of vocational training centres for Palestine refugees, and requests the Agency to act as the recipient and trustee for the special allocations for grants and scholarships; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

18.  Urges<\/i> all States, specialized agencies and non-governmental organizations to continue and to increase their contributions to the Agency so as to ease the ongoing financial constraints, exacerbated by the current humanitarian situation on the ground, and to support the Agency’s valuable work in assisting the Palestine refugees. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

71st plenary meeting<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

10 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/119: 163-6-7<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour <\/u>: Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against <\/u>: Grenada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining <\/u>: Burundi, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Papua New Guinea <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/120. Palestine refugees’ properties and their revenues<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The General Assembly<\/i>,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling <\/i>its resolutions 194 (III) of 11 December 1948, 36\/146 C of 16 December 1981 and all its subsequent resolutions on the question, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Taking note <\/i>of the report of the Secretary-General submitted in pursuance of its resolution 58\/94 of 9 December 2003, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Taking note also <\/i><\/span>of the report of the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine for the period from 1 September 2003 to 31 August 2004,<\/span>47<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling <\/i><\/span>that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights<\/span>48<\/sup><\/span> and the principles of international law uphold the principle that no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his or her property, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling in particular <\/i>its resolution 394 (V) of 14 December 1950, in which it directed the Conciliation Commission, in consultation with the parties concerned, to prescribe measures for the protection of the rights, property and interests of the Palestine refugees, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Noting <\/i><\/span>the completion of the programme of identification and evaluation of Arab property, as announced by the Conciliation Commission in its twenty-second progress report,<\/span>49<\/sup><\/span> and the fact that the Land Office had a schedule of Arab owners and file of documents defining the location, area and other particulars of Arab property, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Expressing its appreciation <\/i>for the work done to preserve and modernize the existing records, including the land records, of the Conciliation Commission and the importance of such records for a just resolution of the plight of the Palestine refugees in conformity with resolution 194 (III), <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling <\/i><\/span>that, within the framework of the Middle East peace process, the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Government of Israel agreed, in the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements of 13 September 1993,<\/span>50<\/sup><\/span> to commence negotiations on permanent status issues, including the important issue of the refugees, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1.   Reaffirms <\/i>that the Palestine refugees are entitled to their property and to the income derived therefrom, in conformity with the principles of equity and justice; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2.  Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to take all appropriate steps, in consultation with the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine, for the protection of Arab property, assets and property rights in Israel; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3.   Calls once again upon <\/i>Israel to render all facilities and assistance to the Secretary-General in the implementation of the present resolution; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

4.   Calls upon <\/i>all the parties concerned to provide the Secretary-General with any pertinent information in their possession concerning Arab property, assets and property rights in Israel that would assist him in the implementation of the present resolution; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

5.  Urges <\/i>the Palestinian and Israeli sides, as agreed between them, to deal with the important issue of Palestine refugees’ properties and their revenues within the framework of the final status negotiations of the Middle East peace process; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

6.  Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session on the implementation of the present resolution. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

71st plenary meeting <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

10 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/120: 161-6-9<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago. Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Grenada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Haiti, Honduras, Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Tuvalu, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices <\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People<\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories<\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/121.   Work of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The General Assembly,<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Guided <\/i>by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Guided also<\/i><\/span> by international humanitarian law, in particular the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>52<\/sup><\/span> as well as international standards of human rights, in particular the Universal Declaration of Human Rights<\/span>53<\/sup><\/span> and the International Covenants on Human Rights,<\/span>54<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling <\/i>its relevant resolutions, including resolutions 2443 (XXIII) of 19 December 1968 and 58\/96 of 9 December 2003, and the relevant resolutions of the Commission on Human Rights, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling also <\/i>the relevant resolutions of the Security Council,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Taking into account <\/i><\/span>the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice on the <\/span>Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory<\/i><\/span>,<\/span>55<\/sup><\/span> and recalling in this regard General Assembly resolution ES-10\/15 of 20 July 2004, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Convinced <\/i>that occupation itself represents a gross and grave violation of human rights, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gravely concerned <\/i>about the continuation of the tragic events that have taken place since 28 September 2000, including the excessive use of force by the Israeli occupying forces against Palestinian civilians, resulting in thousands of deaths and injuries, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Having considered <\/i><\/span>the report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories<\/span>56<\/sup><\/span> and the relevant reports of the Secretary-General,<\/span>57<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling <\/i><\/span>the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements of 13 September 1993<\/span>58<\/sup><\/span> and the subsequent implementation agreements between the Palestinian and Israeli sides, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Expressing the hope <\/i>that the Israeli occupation will be brought to an early end and that therefore the violation of the human rights of the Palestinian people will cease, and recalling in this regard its resolution 58\/292 of 6 May 2004, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1.  Commends <\/i>the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories for its efforts in performing the tasks assigned to it by the General Assembly and for its impartiality; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2.   Reiterates its demand <\/i>that Israel, the occupying Power, cooperate with the Special Committee in implementing its mandate; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3.  <\/span>Deplores <\/i><\/span>those policies and practices of Israel that violate the human rights of the Palestinian people and other Arabs of the occupied territories, as reflected in the report of the Special Committee covering the reporting period;<\/span>56<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

4.   Expresses grave concern <\/i>about the continuing crisis situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, since 28 September 2000, as a result of unlawful Israeli practices and measures, and especially condemns the excessive and indiscriminate use of force against the civilian population, including extrajudicial executions, which has resulted in more than 3,400 Palestinian deaths, including those of more than 750 children, and tens of thousands of injuries; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

5.  <\/span>Requests <\/i><\/span>the Special Committee, pending complete termination of the Israeli occupation, to continue to investigate Israeli policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, especially Israeli violations of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>52 <\/sup><\/span>and to consult, as appropriate, with the International Committee of the Red Cross according to its regulations in order to ensure that the welfare and human rights of the peoples of the occupied territories are safeguarded and to report to the Secretary-General as soon as possible and whenever the need arises thereafter; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

6.   Also requests <\/i>the Special Committee to submit regularly to the Secretary-General periodic reports on the current situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

7.   Further requests <\/i>the Special Committee to continue to investigate the treatment of prisoners and detainees in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

8.  Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General:<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

(a<\/i>)   To provide the Special Committee with all necessary facilities, including those required for its visits to the occupied territories, so that it may investigate Israeli policies and practices referred to in the present resolution; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

(b<\/i>)   To continue to make available such staff as may be necessary to assist the Special Committee in the performance of its tasks; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

(c<\/i>)   To circulate regularly to Member States the periodic reports mentioned in paragraph 6 above; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

(d<\/i>)   To ensure the widest circulation of the reports of the Special Committee and of information regarding its activities and findings, by all means available, through the Department of Public Information of the Secretariat and, where necessary, to reprint those reports of the Special Committee that are no longer available; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

(e<\/i>)   To report to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session on the tasks entrusted to him in the present resolution; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

9.  Decides <\/i>to include in the provisional agenda of its sixtieth session the item entitled “Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories”. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

71st plenary meeting <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

10 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/121: 84-9-80<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Benin, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Cuba, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Djibouti, Dominica, Ecuador, Egypt, Gabon, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kuwait, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Paraguay, Qatar, Saint Lucia, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Somalia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Australia, Canada, Grenada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Nauru, Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Albania, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Austria, Bahamas, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Burundi, Cameroon, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

59\/122.   Applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the other occupied Arab territories <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  The General Assembly,<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i>its relevant resolutions, including its resolution 58\/292 of 6 May 2004, <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

  Recalling also<\/i> its resolution ES-10\/15 of 20 July 2004,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Bearing in mind <\/i>the relevant resolutions of the Security Council,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling <\/i><\/span>the Regulations annexed to the Hague Convention IV of 1907,<\/span>59<\/sup><\/span> the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>60<\/sup><\/span> and relevant provisions of customary law, including those codified in Additional Protocol I<\/span>61<\/sup><\/span> to the four Geneva Conventions,<\/span>62<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Having considered <\/i><\/span>the report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories<\/span>63<\/sup><\/span> and the relevant reports of the Secretary-General,<\/span>64<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Considering <\/i>that the promotion of respect for the obligations arising from the Charter of the United Nations and other instruments and rules of international law is among the basic purposes and principles of the United Nations, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling <\/i><\/span>the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice,<\/span>65<\/sup><\/span> and also recalling General Assembly resolution ES-10\/15, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Noting in particular <\/i><\/span>the Court’s reply, including that the Fourth Geneva Convention<\/span>60<\/sup><\/span> is applicable in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and that Israel is in breach of several of the provisions of the Convention, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Noting <\/i>the convening for the first time, on 15 July 1999, of a Conference of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention, as recommended by the General Assembly in its resolution ES-10\/6 of 9 February 1999, on measures to enforce the Convention in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and to ensure respect thereof in accordance with article 1 common to the four Geneva Conventions, and aware of the statement adopted by the Conference, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Welcoming <\/i>the reconvening of the Conference of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention on 5 December 2001 in Geneva and stressing the importance of the Declaration adopted by the Conference, and underlining the need for the parties to follow up the implementation of the Declaration, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Welcoming and encouraging <\/i>the initiatives by States parties to the Convention, both individually and collectively, according to article 1 common to the four Geneva Conventions, aimed at ensuring respect for the Convention, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Stressing <\/i>that Israel, the occupying Power, should comply strictly with its obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 1.  <\/span>Reaffirms <\/i><\/span>that the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>60<\/sup><\/span> is applicable to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 2.  Demands <\/i>that Israel accept the de jure applicability of the Convention in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, and that it comply scrupulously with the provisions of the Convention; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 3.  <\/span>Calls upon <\/i><\/span>all High Contracting Parties to the Convention, in accordance with article 1 common to the four Geneva Conventions<\/span>62<\/sup><\/span> and as mentioned in the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of 9 July 2004,<\/span>65<\/sup><\/span> to continue to exert all efforts to ensure respect for its provisions by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 4.  Reiterates <\/i>the need for speedy implementation of the relevant recommendations contained in the resolutions of its tenth emergency special session, including resolution ES-10\/15, with regard to ensuring respect by Israel, the occupying Power, for the provisions of the Convention; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 5.  Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session on the implementation of the present resolution. <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

71st plenary meeting<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

10 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/122: 160-7-11<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Grenada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Albania, Australia, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/123.   Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the occupied Syrian Golan <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 The General Assembly,<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Guided <\/i>by the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and affirming the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i>its relevant resolutions, including resolution 58\/292 of 6 May 2004, as well as those resolutions adopted at its tenth emergency special session, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Recalling also <\/i>relevant Security Council resolutions, including resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967, 446 (1979) of 22 March 1979, 465 (1980) of 1 March 1980, 476 (1980) of 30 June 1980, 478 (1980) of 20 August 1980, 497 (1981) of 17 December 1981 and 904 (1994) of 18 March 1994, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Reaffirming <\/i><\/span>the applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>66<\/sup><\/span> to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and to the occupied Syrian Golan, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Considering <\/i><\/span>that the transfer by the occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies is a breach of the Fourth Geneva Convention<\/span>66<\/sup><\/span> and relevant provisions of customary law, including those codified in Additional Protocol I<\/span>67<\/sup><\/span> to the Geneva Conventions,<\/span>68<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling <\/i><\/span>the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice on the <\/span>Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory<\/i><\/span>,<\/span>69<\/sup><\/span> and recalling also General Assembly resolution ES-10\/15 of 20 July 2004, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Noting <\/i><\/span>that the Court concluded that “the Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (including East Jerusalem) have been established in breach of international law”,<\/span>70<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Taking note <\/i><\/span>of the recent report of the Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel since 1967,<\/span>71<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling <\/i><\/span>the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements of 13 September 1993<\/span>72<\/sup><\/span> and the subsequent implementation agreements between the Palestinian and Israeli sides, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Recalling also <\/i><\/span>the Quartet road map to a permanent two-State solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,<\/span>73<\/sup><\/span> and noting specifically its call for a freeze on all settlement activity, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Aware <\/i>that Israeli settlement activities have involved, inter alia, the transfer of nationals of the occupying Power into the occupied territories, the confiscation of land, the exploitation of natural resources and other illegal actions against the Palestinian civilian population, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Bearing in mind <\/i>the detrimental impact of Israeli settlement policies, decisions and activities on efforts to achieve peace in the Middle East, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Expressing grave concern <\/i>about the continuation by Israel, the occupying Power, of settlement activities, in violation of international humanitarian law, relevant United Nations resolutions and the agreements reached between the parties, including the construction and expansion of the settlements in Jabal Abu-Ghneim and Ras Al-Amud in and around Occupied East Jerusalem, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Expressing grave concern also <\/i>about the continuing unlawful construction by Israel of the wall inside the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, and expressing its concern in particular about the route of the wall in departure from the Armistice Line of 1949, which could prejudge future negotiations and make the two-State solution physically impossible to implement and which is causing the Palestinian people further humanitarian hardship, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Deeply concerned <\/i>that the wall’s route has been traced in such a way as to include the great majority of the Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Reiterating its opposition <\/i>to settlement activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and to any activities involving the confiscation of land, the disruption of the livelihood of protected persons and the de facto annexation of land, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i>the need to end all acts of violence, including acts of terror, provocation, incitement and destruction, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Gravely concerned <\/i>about the dangerous situation resulting from actions taken by the illegal armed Israeli settlers in the occupied territory, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Taking note <\/i><\/span>of the relevant reports of the Secretary-General,<\/span>74<\/sup><\/span><\/a> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 1.   Reaffirms <\/i>that Israeli settlements in the Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan are illegal and an obstacle to peace and economic and social development; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 2.  <\/span> Calls upon <\/i><\/span>Israel to accept the de jure applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>66 <\/sup><\/span>to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and to the occupied Syrian Golan and to abide scrupulously by the provisions of the Convention, in particular article 49; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 3.   Reiterates its demand <\/i>for the complete cessation of all Israeli settlement activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan, and calls for the full implementation of the relevant Security Council resolutions; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 4.  <\/span> Demands <\/i><\/span>that Israel, the occupying Power, comply with its legal obligations, as mentioned in the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice;<\/span>69<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 5.  Stresses <\/i>the need for full implementation of Security Council resolution 904 (1994), in which, among other things, the Council called upon Israel, the occupying Power, to continue to take and implement measures, including confiscation of arms, with the aim of preventing illegal acts of violence by Israeli settlers, and called for measures to be taken to guarantee the safety and protection of the Palestinian civilians in the occupied territory; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 6.   Reiterates its calls <\/i>for the prevention of all acts of violence by Israeli settlers, especially against Palestinian civilians and property, particularly in the light of recent developments; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 7.   Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session on the implementation of the present resolution. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

71st plenary meeting <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

10 December 2004 <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/123: 155-8-15<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Australia, Grenada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Nauru, Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Albania, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Dominican Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Haiti, Kenya, Nicaragua, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/124.   Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 The General Assembly,<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i>its relevant resolutions, including resolution 58\/292 of 6 May 2004, as well as those adopted at its tenth emergency special session, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Recalling also<\/i> the relevant resolutions of the Commission on Human Rights, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Bearing in mind <\/i>the relevant resolutions of the Security Council, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Having considered <\/i><\/span>the report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories<\/span>75<\/sup><\/span> and the report of the Secretary-General,<\/span>76<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Taking note <\/i><\/span>of the report of the Human Rights Inquiry Commission established by the Commission on Human Rights <\/span>77<\/sup><\/span> and the recent reports of the Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel since 1967,<\/span>78<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling <\/i><\/span>the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice,<\/span>79<\/sup><\/span> and recalling also General Assembly resolution ES-10\/15 of <\/span>20 July 2004, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Noting in particular <\/i>the Court’s reply, including that the construction of the wall by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, and its associated regime are contrary to international law, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling <\/i><\/span>the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,<\/span>80<\/sup><\/span> the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights<\/span> 80<\/sup><\/span> and the Convention on the Rights of the Child,<\/span>81<\/sup><\/span> and affirming that these human rights instruments must be respected in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Aware <\/i>of the responsibility of the international community to promote human rights and ensure respect for international law, and recalling in this regard its resolution 2625 (XXV) of 24 October 1970, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Reaffirming <\/i>the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Reaffirming also <\/i><\/span>the applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>82<\/sup><\/span> to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Reaffirming further <\/i><\/span>the obligation of the States parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention<\/span>82 <\/sup><\/span>under articles 146, 147 and 148 with regard to penal sanctions, grave breaches and responsibilities of the High Contracting Parties, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Reaffirming <\/i>that all States have the right and the duty to take actions in conformity with international law and international humanitarian law to counter deadly acts of violence against their civilian population in order to protect the lives of their citizens, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Stressing <\/i><\/span>the need for full compliance with the Israeli-Palestinian agreements reached within the context of the Middle East peace process and the implementation of the Quartet road map to a permanent two-State solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,<\/span>83<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Concerned <\/i>about the continuing systematic violation of the human rights of the Palestinian people by Israel, the occupying Power, including that arising from the excessive use of force, the use of collective punishment, the reoccupation and closure of areas, the confiscation of land, the establishment and expansion of settlements, the construction of the wall inside the Occupied Palestinian Territory in departure from the Armistice Line of 1949, the destruction of property and all other actions by it designed to change the legal status, geographical nature and demographic composition of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Gravely concerned <\/i>about the military actions that have been carried out since 28 September 2000 and that have led to thousands of deaths among Palestinian civilians, including hundreds of children, and tens of thousands of injuries, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Expressing deep concern <\/i>about the extensive destruction caused by the Israeli occupying forces, including of religious, cultural and historical sites, of vital infrastructure and institutions of the Palestinian Authority, and of agricultural land throughout Palestinian cities, towns, villages and refugee camps, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Expressing deep concern also<\/i> about the Israeli policy of closure and the severe restrictions, including curfews, that continue to be imposed on the movement of persons and goods, including medical and humanitarian personnel and goods, throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the consequent negative impact on the socio-economic situation of the Palestinian people, which remains that of a dire humanitarian crisis, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Expressing concern <\/i>that thousands of Palestinians continue to be held in Israeli prisons or detention centres under harsh conditions that impair their well-being, and also expressing concern about the ill-treatment and harassment of any Palestinian prisoners and all reports of torture, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Convinced <\/i>of the need for an international presence to monitor the situation, to contribute to ending the violence and protecting the Palestinian civilians and to help the parties to implement agreements reached, and, in this regard, recalling the positive contribution of the Temporary International Presence in Hebron, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Stressing <\/i>the necessity for the full implementation of all relevant Security Council resolutions, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 1.  <\/span> Reiterates <\/i><\/span>that all measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, in violation of the relevant provisions of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>82<\/sup><\/span> and contrary to the relevant resolutions of the Security Council, are illegal and have no validity; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 2.  <\/span> Demands <\/i><\/span>that Israel, the occupying Power, comply fully with the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 <\/span>82<\/sup><\/span> and cease immediately all measures and actions taken in violation and in breach of the Convention, including the extrajudicial executions; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 3.   Condemns <\/i>all acts of violence, including all acts of terror, provocation, incitement and destruction, especially the excessive use of force by the Israeli occupying forces against Palestinian civilians, resulting in extensive loss of life, vast numbers of injuries and massive destruction of homes, properties, agricultural lands and vital infrastructure; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 4.   Expresses grave concern <\/i>at the use of suicide bombing attacks against Israeli civilians, resulting in extensive loss of life and injury; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 5.   Condemns <\/i>the events that occurred in the Jenin refugee camp in April 2002, including the loss of life, injury, widespread destruction and displacement inflicted on many of its civilian inhabitants; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 6.   Condemns also <\/i>the killing of Palestinian civilians and the widespread demolition of homes by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Rafah refugee camp in May 2004 and in the Jabaliya refugee camp in October 2004; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 7.   Demands <\/i>that Israel, the occupying Power, cease all practices and actions which violate the human rights of the Palestinian people, respect human rights law and comply with its obligations; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 8.  <\/span> Demands also <\/i><\/span>that Israel, the occupying Power, comply with its legal obligations under international law, as mentioned in the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice<\/span>79<\/sup><\/span> and as demanded in resolution ES-10\/15 and resolution ES-10\/13 of 21 October 2003, and that it cease the construction of the wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, dismantle forthwith the structure situated therein, repeal or render ineffective all legislative and regulatory acts relating thereto, and make reparation for all damage caused by the construction of the wall; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 9.   Stresses <\/i>the need to preserve the territorial integrity of all the Occupied Palestinian Territory and to guarantee the freedom of movement of persons and goods within the Palestinian territory, including the removal of restrictions on movement into and from East Jerusalem, and the freedom of movement to and from the outside world; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 10.   Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session on the implementation of the present resolution. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 71st plenary meeting<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

10 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/124: 149-7-22<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Ecuador, Egypt, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Australia, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Nauru, Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Albania, Cameroon, Canada, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Grenada, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Iceland, Kenya, Nicaragua, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/125.   The occupied Syrian Golan<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  The General Assembly,<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Having considered <\/i><\/span>the report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories,<\/span>84<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Deeply concerned <\/i>that the Syrian Golan, occupied since 1967, has been under continued Israeli military occupation, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i>Security Council resolution 497 (1981) of 17 December 1981,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling also <\/i>its previous relevant resolutions, the most recent of which was resolution 58\/100 of 9 December 2003, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Having considered <\/i><\/span>the report of the Secretary-General submitted in pursuance of resolution 58\/100,<\/span>85<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i>its previous relevant resolutions in which, inter alia, it called upon Israel to put an end to its occupation of the Arab territories, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Reaffirming once more <\/i>the illegality of the decision of 14 December 1981 taken by Israel to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the occupied Syrian Golan, which has resulted in the effective annexation of that territory, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Reaffirming <\/i>that the acquisition of territory by force is inadmissible under international law, including the Charter of the United Nations, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Reaffirming also <\/i><\/span>the applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>86<\/sup><\/span> to the occupied Syrian Golan,<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Bearing in mind <\/i>Security Council resolution 237 (1967) of 14 June 1967,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Welcoming <\/i>the convening at Madrid of the Peace Conference on the Middle East on the basis of Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967 and 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973 aimed at the realization of a just, comprehensive and lasting peace, and expressing grave concern about the stalling of the peace process on all tracks, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 1.   Calls upon <\/i>Israel, the occupying Power, to comply with the relevant resolutions on the occupied Syrian Golan, in particular Security Council resolution 497 (1981), in which the Council, inter alia, decided that the Israeli decision to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration on the occupied Syrian Golan was null and void and without international legal effect, and demanded that Israel, the occupying Power, rescind forthwith its decision; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 2.   Also calls upon <\/i>Israel to desist from changing the physical character, demographic composition, institutional structure and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan and in particular to desist from the establishment of settlements; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 3.  <\/span> Determines <\/i><\/span>that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void, constitute a flagrant violation of international law and of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>86<\/sup><\/span> and have no legal effect;<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 4.  Calls upon <\/i>Israel to desist from imposing Israeli citizenship and Israeli identity cards on the Syrian citizens in the occupied Syrian Golan, and from its repressive measures against the population of the occupied Syrian Golan; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 5.   Deplores <\/i>the violations by Israel of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 6.   Calls once again upon <\/i>Member States not to recognize any of the legislative or administrative measures and actions referred to above; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 7.   Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session on the implementation of the present resolution. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

71st plenary meeting <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

10 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/125: 160-2-15<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic Of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Against<\/u> :  Israel, Palau <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Albania, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Dominican Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Grenada, Haiti, Kenya, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Nauru, Tonga, Tuvalu, United States of America, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian and disaster relief assistance <\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

of the United Nations, including special economic assistance<\/u><\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/56. Assistance to the Palestinian people<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 The General Assembly<\/i>,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling<\/i> its resolution 58\/113 of 17 December 2003, as well as previous resolutions on the question, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Recalling also<\/i><\/span> the signing of the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements in Washington, D.C., on 13 September 1993, by the Government of the State of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, the representative of the Palestinian people,<\/span>87<\/sup><\/span> and the subsequent implementation agreements concluded by the two sides, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Gravely concerned<\/i> at the deterioration in the living conditions of the Palestinian people throughout the occupied territory, which constitutes a mounting humanitarian crisis, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Conscious <\/i>of the urgent need for improvement in the economic and social infrastructure of the occupied territory, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Aware<\/i> that development is difficult under occupation and is best promoted in circumstances of peace and stability, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Noting <\/i>the great economic and social challenges facing the Palestinian people and their leadership, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Conscious <\/i>of the urgent necessity for international assistance to the Palestinian people, taking into account the Palestinian priorities, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Welcoming <\/i>the results of the Conference to Support Middle East Peace, convened in Washington, D.C., on 1 October 1993, the establishment of the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee and the work being done by the World Bank as its secretariat and the establishment of the Consultative Group, as well as all follow-up meetings and international mechanisms established to provide assistance to the Palestinian people, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Welcoming also <\/i>the work of the Joint Liaison Committee, which provides a forum in which economic policy and practical matters related to donor assistance are discussed with the Palestinian Authority, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Stressing <\/i>the continued importance of the work of the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee in the coordination of assistance to the Palestinian people, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Noting <\/i>the upcoming meeting of the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee to review the state of the Palestinian economy, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Stressing <\/i>the need for the full engagement of the United Nations in the process of building Palestinian institutions and in providing broad assistance to the Palestinian people, and welcoming in this regard the support provided to the Palestinian Authority by the Task Force on Palestinian Reform, established by the Quartet in 2002, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Noting<\/i> , in this regard, the active participation of the United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process and Personal Representative of the Secretary-General to the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority in the activities of the Special Envoys of the Quartet, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Welcoming <\/i><\/span>the endorsement by the Security Council, in its resolution 1515 (2003) of 19 November 2003, of the performance-based road map to a permanent two-State solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,<\/span>88<\/sup><\/span> and stressing the need for its implementation and compliance with its provisions, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Having considered <\/i><\/span>the report of the Secretary-General,<\/span>89<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Expressing grave concern <\/i>at the continuation of the recent tragic and violent events that have led to many deaths and injuries, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 1.  <\/span> Takes note <\/i><\/span>of the report of the Secretary-General;<\/span>89<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 2.  <\/span> Also takes note<\/i><\/span> of the report of the Personal Humanitarian Envoy of the Secretary-General on the humanitarian conditions and needs of the Palestinian people;<\/span>90<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 3.   Expresses its appreciation <\/i>to the Secretary-General for his rapid response and efforts regarding assistance to the Palestinian people; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 4.   Also expresses its appreciation <\/i>to the Member States, United Nations bodies and intergovernmental, regional and non-governmental organizations that have provided and continue to provide assistance to the Palestinian people; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 5.   Stresses <\/i>the importance of the work of the United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process and Personal Representative of the Secretary-General to the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority and of the steps taken under the auspices of the Secretary-General to ensure the achievement of a coordinated mechanism for United Nations activities throughout the occupied territories; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 6.   Urges <\/i>Member States, international financial institutions of the United Nations system, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations and regional and interregional organizations to extend, as rapidly and as generously as possible, economic and social assistance to the Palestinian people, in close cooperation with the Palestine Liberation Organization and through official Palestinian institutions; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 7.   Calls upon <\/i>relevant organizations and agencies of the United Nations system to intensify their assistance in response to the urgent needs of the Palestinian people in accordance with Palestinian priorities set forth by the Palestinian Authority; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 8.   Urges <\/i>Member States to open their markets to exports of Palestinian products on the most favourable terms, consistent with appropriate trading rules, and to implement fully existing trade and cooperation agreements; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 9.   Calls upon <\/i>the international donor community to expedite the delivery of pledged assistance to the Palestinian people to meet their urgent needs; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 10.   Stresses<\/i>, in this context, the importance of ensuring the free passage of aid to the Palestinian people and the free movement of persons and goods; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 11.   Urges <\/i>the international donor community, United Nations agencies and organizations and non-governmental organizations to extend as rapidly as possible emergency economic and humanitarian assistance to the Palestinian people to counter the impact of the current crisis; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 12.  <\/span> Stresses <\/i><\/span>the need to implement the Paris Protocol on Economic Relations of 29 April 1994, fifth annex to the Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, signed in Washington, D.C., on 28 September 1995,<\/span>91<\/sup><\/span> in particular with regard to the full and prompt clearance of Palestinian indirect tax revenues, and welcomes the progress made in this regard; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 13.   Suggests <\/i>the convening in 2005 of a United Nations-sponsored seminar on assistance to the Palestinian people; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 14.   Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to submit a report to the General Assembly at its sixtieth session, through the Economic and Social Council, on the implementation of the present resolution, containing: <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 (a<\/i>)   An assessment of the assistance actually received by the Palestinian people; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 (b<\/i>)   An assessment of the needs still unmet and specific proposals for responding effectively to them;<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 15.  Decides <\/i>to include in the provisional agenda of its sixtieth session the sub-item entitled “Assistance to the Palestinian people”. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

65th plenary meeting <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Adopted without a vote<\/strong><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/173. Situation of and assistance to Palestinian children<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  The General Assembly<\/i>,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i><\/span>the Convention on the Rights of the Child,<\/span>92<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Bearing in mind <\/i><\/span>the conclusion by the International Court of Justice, in its advisory opinion of 9 July 2004,<\/span>93<\/sup><\/span> that the Convention on the Rights of the Child is applicable within the Occupied Palestinian Territory, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling <\/i><\/span>the World Declaration on the Survival, Protection and Development of Children and the Plan of Action for Implementing the World Declaration on the Survival, Protection and Development of Children in the 1990s adopted by the World Summit for Children, held in New York on 29 and 30 September 1990,<\/span>94<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Recalling also <\/i><\/span>the Declaration and Plan of Action adopted by the General Assembly at its twenty-seventh special session,<\/span>95<\/sup><\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling further <\/i><\/span>the relevant provisions of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,<\/span>96<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Noting with grave concern <\/i>that the Palestinian children under Israeli occupation remain deprived of many basic rights under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Concerned <\/i>about the continued grave deterioration of the situation of Palestinian children in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, the severely detrimental impact of the continuing Israeli assaults and sieges on Palestinian cities, towns, villages and refugee camps, and the continuing dire humanitarian crisis on the safety and well-being of Palestinian children, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Concerned also <\/i>about the severely detrimental impact being caused by the unlawful construction of the wall by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, and its associated regime, on the socio-economic conditions of Palestinian children and their families and on the enjoyment by Palestinian children of their right to education, to an adequate standard of living, including adequate food, clothing and housing, to health and to be free from hunger, in accordance with the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Emphasizing <\/i>the importance of the safety and well-being of all children in the whole Middle East region, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Expressing its condemnation <\/i>of all acts of violence, resulting in extensive loss of human life and injuries, including among Palestinian children, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Deeply concerned <\/i>about the negative consequences, including psychological consequences, of the Israeli military actions for the present and future well-being of Palestinian children, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 1.   Stresses <\/i>the urgent need for Palestinian children to live a normal life free from foreign occupation, destruction and fear in their own State; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 2.  <\/span> Demands<\/i><\/span>, in the meanwhile, that Israel, the occupying Power, respect relevant provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the Child<\/span>92<\/sup><\/span> <\/sup><\/span>and comply fully with the provisions of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>97<\/sup><\/span> in order to ensure the well-being and protection of Palestinian children and their families; <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 3.   Calls upon <\/i>the international community to provide urgently needed assistance and services in an effort to alleviate the dire humanitarian crisis being faced by Palestinian children and their families and to help in the reconstruction of relevant Palestinian institutions. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

74th plenary meeting <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

20 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/173: 117-5-62<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u> : Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Chad, Chile, China, Comoros, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Cuba, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Grenada, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Philippines, Qatar, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Somalia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Albania, Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Benin, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Monaco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Samoa, San Marino, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Tonga, Tuvalu, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Uruguay, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Right of peoples to self-determination<\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/179. The right of the Palestinian people to self-determination<\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 The General Assembly<\/i>, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Aware<\/i> that the development of friendly relations among nations, based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, is among the purposes and principles of the United Nations, as defined in the Charter, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i>, in this regard, its resolution 2625 (XXV) of 24 October 1970 entitled “Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations”, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> Bearing in mind<\/i><\/span> the International Covenants on Human Rights,<\/span>98<\/sup><\/span> the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,<\/span>99<\/sup><\/span> the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples<\/span>100<\/sup><\/span> and the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action adopted at the World Conference on Human Rights on 25 June 1993,<\/span>101<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling<\/i><\/span> the Declaration on the Occasion of the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations,<\/span>102<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling also<\/i><\/span> the United Nations Millennium Declaration,<\/span>103<\/sup><\/span><\/a> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling further <\/i><\/span>the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice on the <\/span>Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory<\/i><\/span>,<\/span>104<\/sup><\/span> and noting in particular the reply of the Court, including on the right of peoples to self-determination, which is a right <\/span>erga omnes<\/i><\/span>,<\/span>105<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling<\/i><\/span> the conclusion of the Court, in its advisory opinion of 9 July 2004, that the construction of the wall by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, along with measures previously taken, severely impedes the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination,<\/span>106<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Expressing the urgent need<\/i> for the resumption of negotiations within the Middle East peace process on its agreed basis and for the speedy achievement of a final settlement between the Palestinian and Israeli sides, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i>its resolution 58\/292 of 6 May 2004,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Affirming<\/i> the right of all States in the region to live in peace within secure and internationally recognized borders, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 1.   Reaffirms<\/i> the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, including the right to their independent State of Palestine; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 2.   Urges<\/i> all States and the specialized agencies and organizations of the United Nations system to continue to support and assist the Palestinian people in the early realization of their right to self-determination. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

74th plenary meeting <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

20 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/179: 179-5-3<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour<\/u>: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Republic Of Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Australia, Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Permanent sovereignty of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian <\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Territory, including East Jerusalem, and of the Arab population in the <\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

occupied Syrian Golan over their natural resources<\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59\/251.   Permanent sovereignty of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and of the Arab population in the occupied Syrian Golan over their natural resources<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 The General Assembly<\/i>,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling<\/i> its resolution 58\/229 of 23 December 2003, and taking note of Economic and Social Council resolution 2004\/54 of 23 July 2004, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Recalling also<\/i> its resolution 58\/292 of 6 May 2004,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Reaffirming <\/i>the principle of the permanent sovereignty of peoples under foreign occupation over their natural resources, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Guided<\/i> by the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, affirming the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force, and recalling relevant Security Council resolutions, including resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967, 465 (1980) of 1 March 1980 and 497 (1981) of 17 December 1981, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Recalling<\/i> its resolution 2625 (XXV) of 24 October 1970,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Reaffirming <\/i><\/span>the applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,<\/span>107<\/sup><\/span> to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>Recalling<\/i><\/span> the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice on the “Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory”,<\/span>108<\/sup><\/span> and recalling also its resolution ES-10\/15 of 20 July 2004,<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Expressing its concern <\/i>at the exploitation by Israel, the occupying Power, of the natural resources of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Expressing its concern also <\/i>at the extensive destruction by Israel, the occupying Power, of agricultural land and orchards in the Occupied Palestinian Territory during the recent period, including the uprooting of a vast number of olive trees, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Aware <\/i>of the detrimental impact of the Israeli settlements on Palestinian and other Arab natural resources, especially as a result of the confiscation of land and the forced diversion of water resources, and of the dire economic and social consequences in this regard, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  Aware also <\/i>of the detrimental impact on Palestinian natural resources being caused by the unlawful construction of the wall by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including in and around East Jerusalem, and of its grave effect on the economic and social conditions of the Palestinian people, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/span>Reaffirming <\/i><\/span>the need for the immediate resumption of negotiations within the Middle East peace process, on the basis of Security Council resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973, 425 (1978) of 19 March 1978 and 1397 (2002) of 12 March 2002, the principle of land for peace and the Quartet performance-based road map to a permanent two-State solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,<\/span>109<\/sup><\/span> as endorsed by the Security Council in its resolution 1515 (2003) of 19 November 2003, and for the achievement of a final settlement on all tracks, <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 Recalling <\/i>the need to end all acts of violence, including acts of terror, provocation, incitement and destruction, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/span>Taking note <\/i><\/span>of the note by the Secretary-General transmitting the report prepared by the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia on the economic and social repercussions of the Israeli occupation on the living conditions of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including Jerusalem, and of the Arab population in the occupied Syrian Golan,<\/span>110<\/sup><\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 1.  Reaffirms <\/i>the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people and the population of the occupied Syrian Golan over their natural resources, including land and water; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  2.  Calls upon <\/i>Israel, the occupying Power, not to exploit, damage, cause loss or depletion of or endanger the natural resources in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  3.  Recognizes <\/i>the right of the Palestinian people to claim restitution as a result of any exploitation, damage, loss or depletion, or endangerment of their natural resources, and expresses the hope that this issue will be dealt with in the framework of the final status negotiations between the Palestinian and Israeli sides; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  4.  Requests <\/i>the Secretary-General to report to it at its sixtieth session on the implementation of the present resolution, and decides to include in the provisional agenda of its sixtieth session the item entitled “Permanent sovereignty of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and of the Arab population in the occupied Syrian Golan over their natural resources”. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

75th plenary meeting<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

22 December 2004<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

RECORDED VOTE ON RESOLUTION 59\/251: 156-5-11<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In favour <\/u>: Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Against<\/u> : Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, United States of America <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Abstaining<\/u> : Albania, Australia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Côte d'Ivoire, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Nauru, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/strong><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

\n<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

SECURITY COÄ¢¹½ÊÓƵCIL<\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

RESOLUTION<\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n

Resolution 1544 (2004)<\/strong><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Adopted by the Security Council at its 4972nd meeting, on <\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

19 May 2004<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The Security Council,<\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reaffirming<\/i> its previous resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 446 (1979), 1322 (2000), 1397 (2002), 1402 (2002), 1403 (2002), 1405 (2002), 1435 (2002), and 1515 (2003), <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reiterating<\/i> the obligation of Israel, the occupying Power, to abide scrupulously by its legal obligations and responsibilities under the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Calling<\/i> on Israel to address its security needs within the boundaries of international law, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Expressing<\/i> its grave concern at the continued deterioration of the situation on the ground in the territory occupied by Israel since 1967, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Condemning<\/i> the killing of Palestinian civilians that took place in the Rafah area, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Gravely concerned by <\/i>the recent demolition of homes committed by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Rafah refugee camp, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Recalling<\/i> the obligations of the Palestinian Authority and the Government of Israel under the Road Map, <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Condemning<\/i> all acts of violence, terror and destruction,<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reaffirming<\/i> its support for the Road Map, endorsed in its resolution 1515 (2003), <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1.  Calls<\/i> on Israel to respect its obligations under international humanitarian law, and insists, in particular, on its obligation not to undertake demolition of homes contrary to that law; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2.  Expresses <\/i>grave concern regarding the humanitarian situation of Palestinians made homeless in the Rafah area and calls <\/i>for the provision of emergency assistance to them;<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3.  Calls<\/i> for the cessation of violence and for respect of and adherence to legal obligations, including those under international humanitarian law; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

4.  Calls<\/i> on both parties to immediately implement their obligations under the Road Map; <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

5.  Decides <\/i>to remain seized of the matter.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/i> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Adopted by 14 votes to none, with 1 abstention (United States of America).<\/strong> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

  <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

* * * * *<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Notes<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 75, No. 973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2<\/sup><\/span>See Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, <\/span>The Hague Conventions and Declarations of 1899 and 1907<\/i><\/span> (New York, Oxford University Press, 1915).<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3<\/sup><\/span>See Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, <\/span>The Hague Conventions and Declarations of 1899 and 1907<\/i><\/span> (New York, Oxford University Press, 1915).<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

4<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 75, No. 973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

5<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., vol. 1125, No. 17512.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

6<\/sup><\/span>See resolution 2200 A (XXI), annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

7<\/sup><\/span>Resolution 44\/25, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

8<\/sup><\/span>S\/2003\/529, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

9<\/sup><\/span>See A\/ES-10\/273 and Corr.1<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

10<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., para. 163.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

11<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., para. 120.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

12<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., para. 162.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

13<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 75, No. 970-973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

14<\/sup><\/span>Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-ninth Session, Supplement No. 35 (A\/59\/35).<\/i><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

15<\/sup><\/span>S\/2003\/529, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

16<\/sup><\/span>See A\/ES-10\/273 and Corr.1<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

17<\/sup><\/span>Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-ninth Session, Supplement No. 35 (A\/59\/35).<\/i><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

18<\/sup><\/span>Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-ninth Session, Supplement No. 35 (A\/59\/35).<\/i><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

19<\/sup><\/span>S\/2003\/529, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

20<\/sup><\/span>See A\/ES-10\/273 and Corr.1<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

21<\/sup><\/span>A\/59\/574-S\/2004\/909.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

22<\/sup><\/span>See A\/ES-10\/273 and Corr.1<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

23<\/sup><\/span>See A\/48\/486-S\/26560, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

24<\/sup><\/span>S\/2003\/529, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

25<\/sup><\/span>See A\/ES-10\/273 and Corr.1, advisory opinnion, para 161.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

26<\/sup><\/span>A\/56\/1026-S\/2002\/932, annex II, resolution 14\/221.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

27<\/sup><\/span>See A\/ES-10\/273 and Corr.1<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

28<\/sup><\/span>A\/59\/431.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

29<\/sup><\/span>A\/59\/338.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

30<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 75, No. 973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

31<\/sup><\/span>See Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, <\/span>The Hague Conventions and Declarations of 1899 and 1907<\/i><\/span> (New York, Oxford University Press, 1915).<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

32<\/sup><\/span>Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-ninth Session, Supplement No. 13 (A\/59\/13).<\/i><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

33<\/sup><\/span>A\/48\/486-S\/26560, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

34<\/sup><\/span>A\/59\/121.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

35<\/sup><\/span>Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-ninth Session, Supplement No. 13 (A\/59\/13).<\/i><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

36<\/sup><\/span>A\/48\/486-S\/26560, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

37<\/sup><\/span>Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-ninth Session, Supplement No. 13 (A\/59\/13).<\/i><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

38<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., p. viii.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

39<\/sup><\/span>Resolution 22 A (I).<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

40<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 2051, No. 35457.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

41<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., vol. 75, No. 973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

42<\/sup><\/span>A\/48\/486-S\/26560, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

43<\/sup><\/span>Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-ninth Session, Supplement No. 13 (A\/59\/13), <\/i><\/span>annex I<\/span>.<\/i><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

44<\/sup><\/span>A\/59\/442.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

45<\/sup><\/span>Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-ninth Session, Supplement No. 13 (A\/59\/13), <\/i><\/span>addendum (A\/58\/13\/Add.1)<\/span>.<\/i><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

46<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 1577, No. 27531.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

47<\/sup><\/span>A\/59\/279.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

48<\/sup><\/span>A\/59\/260, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

49<\/sup><\/span>Resolution 217 A (III).<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

50<\/sup><\/span>Official Records of the General Assembly, <\/i><\/span>Nineteenth Session, Annexes, <\/i><\/span>Annex No. 11, document A\/5700<\/span>.<\/i><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

51<\/sup><\/span>A\/48\/486-S\/26560, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

52<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 75, No. 973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

53<\/sup><\/span>Resolution 217 A (III).<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

54<\/sup><\/span>Resolution 2200 A (XXI), annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

55<\/sup><\/span>See A\/ES-10\/273 and Corr.1<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

56<\/sup><\/span>See A\/59\/381.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

57<\/sup><\/span>A\/59\/338, A\/59\/339, A\/59\/343, A\/59\/344 and A\/59\/345.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

58<\/sup><\/span>A\/48\/486-S\/26560, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

59<\/sup><\/span>See Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, <\/span>The Hague Conventions and Declarations of 1899 and 1907<\/i><\/span> (New York, Oxford University Press, 1915).<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

60<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 75, No. 973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

61<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., vol. 1125, No. 17512.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

62<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., vol. 75, Nos. 970-973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

63<\/sup><\/span>See A\/59\/381.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

64<\/sup><\/span>A\/59\/338, A\/59\/339, A\/59\/343, A\/59\/344 and A\/59\/345.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

65<\/sup><\/span>See A\/ES-10\/273 and Corr.1<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

66<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 75, No. 973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

67<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., vol. 1125, No. 17512.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

68<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., vol. 75, Nos. 970-973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

69<\/sup><\/span>See A\/ES-10\/273 and Corr.1<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

70<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., advisory opinion, para. 120.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

71<\/sup><\/span>See A\/59\/256.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

72<\/sup><\/span>A\/48\/486-S\/26560, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

73<\/sup><\/span>S\/2003\/529, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

74<\/sup><\/span>A\/59\/338, A\/59\/339, A\/59\/343, A\/59\/344, A\/59\/345 and A\/59\/381.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

75<\/sup><\/span>See A\/59\/381.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

76<\/sup><\/span>See A\/59\/345.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

77<\/sup><\/span>E\/CN.4\/2001\/121.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

78<\/sup><\/span>See E\/CN.4\/2004\/6 and Add.1 and A\/59\/256.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

79<\/sup><\/span>See A\/ES-10\/273 and Corr.1<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

80<\/sup><\/span>See resolution 2200 A (XXI), annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

81<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 1577, No. 27531.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

82<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., vol. 75, Nos. 970-973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

83<\/sup><\/span>S\/2003\/529, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

84<\/sup><\/span>See A\/59\/381.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

85<\/sup><\/span>See A\/59\/338.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

86<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 75, No. 973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

87<\/sup><\/span>See A\/48\/486-S\/26560, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

88<\/sup><\/span>S\/2003\/529, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

89<\/sup><\/span>A\/59\/121-E\/2004\/88.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

90<\/sup><\/span>Available from <\/span>http:\/\/domino.un.org\/bertini_rpt.htm<\/a>.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

91<\/sup><\/span>A\/51\/889-S\/1997\/357, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

92<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 75, No. 973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

93<\/sup><\/span>See A\/ES-10\/273 and Corr.1<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

94<\/sup><\/span>A\/45\/625, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

95<\/sup><\/span>See resolution S-27\/2, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

96<\/sup><\/span>See resolution 2200 A (XXI), annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

97<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 75, No. 973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

98<\/sup><\/span>See resolution 2200 A (XXI), annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

99<\/sup><\/span>Resolution 217 A (III).<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

100<\/sup><\/span>Resolution 1514 (XV).<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

101<\/sup><\/span>A\/CONF.157\/24 (Part I), chap. III.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

102<\/sup><\/span>See resolution 50\/6.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

103<\/sup><\/span>See resolution 55\/2.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

104<\/sup><\/span>See A\/ES-10\/273 and Corr.1<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

105<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., advisory opinion, para. 88.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

106<\/sup><\/span>Ibid., para. 122.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

107<\/sup><\/span>United Nations, <\/span>Treaty Series<\/i><\/span>, vol. 75, No. 973.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

108<\/sup><\/span>A\/ES-10\/273 and Corr.1<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

109<\/sup><\/span>S\/2003\/529, annex.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

110<\/sup><\/span>A\/59\/89-E\/2004\/21.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

French:<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

RESOLUTIONS AND DECISIONS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND THE SECURITY COÄ¢¹½ÊÓƵCIL RELATING TO THE QUESTION OF PALESTINE   2004     Introductory note   1.   At the request of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, the Secretariat prepared, in 1976, a compilation of resolutions and decisions of the General Assembly […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"country":[],"document-category":[2717,2569,2433,4676,1326,4565,3745],"document-source":[1753,2173,1365,1362,1897],"committee-meeting":[],"document-subject":[1945,1937,5400,1861,2237,1741,1801,1961,1813,1749,2153,1745,1821,1781,2137,1917,5399],"entity":[1729],"document-language":[6542,6541],"class_list":["post-177498","document","type-document","status-publish","hentry","document-category-compilation-un-resolutions","document-category-document","document-category-french-text","document-category-general-assembly-resolution","document-category-resolution","document-category-security-council-resolution","document-category-voting-record","document-source-ceirpp","document-source-division-for-palestinian-rights-dpr","document-source-general-assembly","document-source-security-council","document-source-united-nations-department-of-public-information-dpi","document-subject-assistance","document-subject-economic-issues","document-subject-fence","document-subject-fourth-geneva-convention","document-subject-golan-heights","document-subject-human-rights-and-international-humanitarian-law","document-subject-inalienable-rights-of-the-palestinian-people","document-subject-jerusalem","document-subject-middle-east-situation","document-subject-palestine-question","document-subject-refugee-camps","document-subject-refugees-and-displaced-persons","document-subject-self-determination","document-subject-separation-barrier","document-subject-settlements","document-subject-situation-in-the-opt-including-jerusalem","document-subject-wall","entity-united-nations-system","document-language-english","document-language-french"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document\/177498","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/document"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document\/177498\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177498"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/country?post=177498"},{"taxonomy":"document-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document-category?post=177498"},{"taxonomy":"document-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document-source?post=177498"},{"taxonomy":"committee-meeting","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/committee-meeting?post=177498"},{"taxonomy":"document-subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document-subject?post=177498"},{"taxonomy":"entity","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/entity?post=177498"},{"taxonomy":"document-language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document-language?post=177498"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}