{"id":189843,"date":"2015-02-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-03-11T22:40:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/?p=189843"},"modified":"2019-03-11T22:40:02","modified_gmt":"2019-03-11T22:40:02","slug":"auto-insert-189843","status":"publish","type":"document","link":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/document\/auto-insert-189843\/","title":{"rendered":"Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories;occupied since 1967, Makarim Wibisono – HRC 28th session – Report"},"content":{"rendered":"
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation <\/p>\n \n Summary<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n The present report, submitted pursuant to Commission on Human Rights resolution 1993\/2 A and Human Rights Council resolution 5\/1, is primarily based on interviews and briefings held with victims, civil society representatives, human rights defenders, and Palestinian officials, among others, in Amman and Cairo in September 2014. The Special Rapporteur made every effort to contact Palestinian victims and witnesses via video and teleconference. In the report, he addresses a number of concerns pertaining to the situation of human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and in particular, on their impact on children.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n \n Contents<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n \n I. Introduction<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n 1.\t<\/span>Since assuming his mandate in June 2014, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967 as spared no effort to secure cooperation of the concerned countries and to conduct a mission to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory, in order to have the opportunity of seeing, hearing and asking his own questions directly to Palestinian victims and various witnesses regarding the situation of human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. To that end, the Special Rapporteur made great efforts to build a relationship of trust with representatives of both Israel and of the State of Palestine.<\/span>1<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 2.\t<\/span>From the outset, together with thematic special procedures mandate holders, the Special Rapporteur expressed serious reservations to the Government of Israel about the nature of Israeli policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Joint letters of allegation and urgent appeals were sent on serious alleged violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law. The concerns raised included the alleged failures to abide by international legal principles leading to the killings of civilians in the Gaza Strip during Israel’s 2014 military operation; the alleged excessive use of force by Israeli security forces during a peaceful demonstration in the West Bank; and the steps being taken by the Government of Israel, which would reportedly lead to the forced eviction and forcible transfer of Palestinian Bedouin communities currently residing in the central West Bank.<\/span>2<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 3.\t<\/span>The Special Rapporteur appreciated the openness to dialogue shown by the representatives of the Governments of Israel and Palestine in Geneva. In June 2014, immediately after taking up his position, the Special Rapporteur informed them of his intention to visit the Occupied Palestinian Territory. In response to a formal request to undertake a country visit by the Special Rapporteur in August 2014, the Permanent Observer Mission of State of Palestine expressed its willingness to assist with the mission, including for consultations with relevant consultations and meetings with relevant authorities. No formal response was received from the Permanent Mission of Israel. The Special Rapporteur persevered in his efforts to seek access through informal dialogue with the Permanent Representative of Israel in Geneva; as at late December 2014, however, none had been granted.<\/p><\/div>\n 4.\t<\/span>Owing to the failure of Israel to provide full and free access to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the present report is based primarily on information collected during the first mission conducted by the Special Rapporteur to the region, including to Amman, on 20 and 21 September 2014, and to Cairo, from 22 to 28 September 2014, to hold interviews and briefings with, inter alia, victims, civil society representatives, human rights defenders and Palestinian officials. Representatives of United Nations entities and nongovernmental organizations and Palestinian officials, including ministers, travelled to Amman from the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, to meet with the Special Rapporteur.<\/p><\/div>\n 5.\t<\/span>Given the lack of access via Israel, the Special Rapporteur had hoped to visit Gaza through the Rafah crossing; this was not possible, however, owing to circumstances beyond his control. In order to hear directly from interlocutors based in Gaza, he held video and teleconferences with those directly affected by the recent escalation of hostilities. The Special Rapporteur extends his sincere appreciation to all those who provided him with testimony and information pertaining to the situation of human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. He is also grateful for the full cooperation extended to him during the mission by the Government of the State of Palestine and for the assistance given by the Governments of Egypt and Jordan.<\/p><\/div>\n 6.\t<\/span><\/span>The report begins by addressing the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip and the impact of the latest round of violence between Israel, on the one hand, and Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups, on the other, from 7 July to 26 August 2014. The information recorded and provided by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) showed that 2,256 Palestinians were killed, of whom 1,563 were civilians, including 538 children.<\/span>3<\/sup><\/span> The numbers speak volumes about the scale of the devastation, but statistics alone cannot do justice to the intensity of human suffering or explain the impact that the conflict will have on Palestinians living in Gaza for months and years to come. It is hoped that the information and testimonies received by the Special Rapporteur will provide a glimpse of the human narrative of those two tragic months and illuminate some of the challenges and problems that lie ahead, particularly with regard to health and education in Gaza.<\/span>4<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 7.\t<\/span>In the present report, the Special Rapporteur will also address a number of equally important issues of serious concern affecting human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and make a number of recommendations to the Government of Israel.<\/p><\/div>\n 8.\t<\/span>The present report is not an exhaustive account of the impact of Israeli occupation policies and practices on the rights of Palestinians that were brought to the attention of the Special Rapporteur. Indeed, there is a long list of pressing human rights issues that merit attention: from the expansion of settlements to settler violence; discriminatory policies in East Jerusalem; and the involvement of businesses in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, to name but a few. The Special Rapporteur intends to address these and other issues in future reports. However, as a starting point, the Special Rapporteur has placed most weight on the accounts he heard directly from the victims of the recent hostilities, and hopes to narrate faithfully the ordeal of those who lived through the traumatic 51 days of conflict, focusing in particular on the impact of children, who account for more than half the population of 1.8 million people in Gaza and represent the future of Palestine.<\/p><\/div>\n 9.\t<\/span>On a final introductory note, the Special Rapporteur reiterates that it is in Israel’s own interest to grant the mandate holder full and unconditional access to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory.<\/span>5<\/sup><\/span> The Special Rapporteur continues to believe that the engagement of Israel would contribute to the effective and even-handed implementation of the mandate. Cooperation with the mandate would be a manifestation of the responsibility of a Member State to respect and protect human rights.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n II.\t<\/span>Situation of human rights in the Gaza Strip<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n A. Overview<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n 10.\t<\/span><\/span>As many Palestinians in Gaza reminded the Special Rapporteur, the seven-year blockade by Israel, coupled with the access-restricted areas along its border often imposed with excessive use of force by the Israel Defense Forces, forces the Palestinian people living in Gaza to live in a perpetual state of humanitarian crisis.<\/span>6<\/sup><\/span> At the most basic level, this has restricted Palestinian agriculture and fishing, and all too frequently impinged upon the right to life of Palestinian farmers and fishermen. According to information provided by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA), the severe restrictions on imports and exports have also denied Palestinians in Gaza the right to meaningful economic development and indeed dragged Gaza back towards a state of de-development, leaving 80 per cent of the population chronically dependent on aid. Frequent power shortages and periodic winter flooding have further exacerbated living conditions for Palestinians in Gaza. Moreover, before the escalation of hostilities during the summer of 2014, Palestinians in Gaza had lived through two previous conflicts with Israel, in 2008 and 2009, and again in 2012, which led to destruction and devastation. Israel may have withdrawn its soldiers from Gaza in the context of its unilateral disengagement in 2005; in terms of the control over the territory it exercises, however, it remains the occupying Power.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 11.\t<\/span><\/span>According to the OHCHR, in the latest round of violence between Israel on the one hand, and Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups on the other, from 7 July to 26 August 2014 (operation “Protective Edge”) 2,256 Palestinian fatalities were recorded, of whom 1,563 were civilians, including 538 children.<\/span>7<\/sup><\/span> This surpassed the combined number of casualties of the two previous conflicts in Gaza. On the Israeli side, 66 soldiers and five civilians were reportedly killed. The Special Rapporteur is aware that thousands of indiscriminate rockets were reportedly fired by Palestinian armed groups from Gaza. The stark disparity in casualty figures on the two sides, however, reflects the skewered balance of power and the disproportionate cost borne by Palestinian civilians, raising questions as to whether Israel adhered to the international law principles of distinction, proportionality and precautions. The 51-day conflict, tempered only by fleeting humanitarian pauses, adversely affected just about every human right, including the rights to adequate housing, health, water, education, work and, last but not least, life.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n B.\t<\/span>Destruction of civilian homes and infrastructure<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n 12.\t<\/span><\/span>The most striking aspect of the military operations conducted by Israel was its apparent deliberate targeting of civilian homes and multi-storey apartment blocks, which resulted in entire families being buried under the rubble of their homes.<\/span>8<\/sup><\/span> In what many witnesses cited as the most egregious example of disproportionality, a multi-storey apartment block known as the “Gaza Twin Towers” was razed to the ground towards the end of Israeli military operations. Other apartment towers flattened by Israeli strikes included the 12-storey al-Zafer tower 4, the Italian tower and the al-Basha tower. Countless reports of schools, mosques and hospitals allegedly targeted during the military operations were also received. An international non-governmental organisation reported that 25 ambulances of the Palestinian Red Crescent were also hit, including 12 that were either destroyed or rendered inoperable.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 13.\t<\/span>Prominent human rights defenders based in Gaza observed, “never in our lives have we seen that level of destruction”, referring to certain neighbourhoods and towns that were particularly hard hit, such as Shuja’iya, Khuza’a and Rafah. Even experienced humanitarian workers, exposed to some of the worst conflict zones across the world, informed the Special Rapporteur that what they saw in Gaza was “shocking, by all accounts”. Three months after the ceasefire, the impact of Israeli strikes on the water and sanitation facilities in Gaza were still being felt, with 20 to 30 per cent of households, or 450,000 people, still without access to municipal water because of the damage caused.<\/span>9<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 14.\t<\/span>Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA schools serving as emergency shelters for internally displaced persons, the exact position of which had been notified to the Israeli Defense Forces, were allegedly targeted by shells or other munitions on at least seven separate occasions, resulting in at least 42 deaths, including 11 Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA staff members. In one incident involving a Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA school in Jabaliya, on 30 July, Israeli shelling allegedly killed 16 people and injured another 100. According to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA, it had already informed the Israeli military authorities of the location of the school 17 times, including once only a few hours prior to the attack. The Special Rapporteur notes that the Secretary-General established, in November 2014, a board of inquiry to review and investigate a number of specific incidents in which death or injuries occurred at and\/or damage was done to United Nations premises. The Special Rapporteur is also aware that Israel has established its own fact-fmding assessment mechanism and has opened a number of criminal investigations into certain selected cases of alleged violations of international law. It remains to be seen if this can bring any measure of meaningful accountability to Palestinian victims in the light of the criticism levelled by observers to date.<\/span>10<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n C.\t<\/span>Mass displacement<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n 15.\t<\/span>At the height of the escalation of hostilities, an estimated 500,000 people were internally displaced across Gaza, many of them forced to take shelter in Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA schools<\/span>11<\/sup><\/span> government-run schools or with extended family or friends.<\/span>12<\/sup><\/span> Many of the school buildings were not designed to serve as shelters, and the sheer number of internally displaced persons seeking shelter reportedly resulted in severe overcrowding and put a considerable strain on sanitation facilities. According to a humanitarian aid worker who visited the schools, the general overcrowding of schools with limited capacity had led to a lack of privacy for families and inadequate hygiene and sanitation conditions that brought about various stress-related ailments, including dermatological conditions. Beyond the school shelters, host families were also reportedly rapidly overwhelmed by the burden of having to host as many as 30 extended family members and relatives, putting considerable financial and psychological strain on all family members. The desperation was summed up by a woman who, exasperated, told a United Nations staff member distributing food items that, “I don’t want food; I want a future for my children”.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 16.\t<\/span>A Palestinian human rights defender originally from Shuja’iya explained that “those people’s minds were as hard as a rock and so attached to their land that they would never leave so easily”. Nonetheless, within minutes of the Israeli assault on that particular neighbourhood on 20 July, he recalled how the bombs, tank shells and naval artillery “shook the ground like an earthquake and opened the gates of hell”. By 6 p.m., 150,000 people were reportedly trying to flee the area. A Palestinian staff member of a nongovernmental organization, speaking also as a mother and former resident from Beit Hanoun, described how the Israelis had called and ordered them to evacuate their home. “We only had a few moments to gather important documents and to take the children out”, she said. “When you look at the framed photos of family and friends on the wall and feel the warmth of your own home, it’s not easy to just leave not knowing if you will ever come back again.”<\/p><\/div>\n 17.\t<\/span>Israel reportedly gave warnings prior to some airstrikes by telephone, text messaging and leaflet drops across the Gaza Strip. Palestinian human rights defenders, however, explained that, in such a confined and densely populated area, for many people there was simply nowhere to run, no safe passage or safe haven, not even in the United Nations shelters. This was particularly the case for the most vulnerable residents: young children, the elderly, pregnant women and the physically disabled. Some witnesses pointed out that young Palestinians in Gaza would choose to go from one potential death in Gaza to another by crossing the Mediterranean in rickety boats in an attempt to reach Europe, which showed and how desperate people were to leave Gaza.<\/p><\/div>\n D.\t<\/span>Civilian casualties: families and children<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n 18.\t<\/span>According to OHCHR, some 69 per cent of the Palestinians killed during the hostilities in Gaza were civilians. An Israeli organization compiling its own statistics on Palestinian fatalities has so far found the Palestinian civilian to combatant casualty ratio to be somewhat lower, at 48 per cent.<\/span>13<\/sup><\/span> On both counts, serious questions arise with regard to Israel’s adherence to the principles of international humanitarian law.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 19.\t<\/span>The most striking aspect of the most recent conflict was the way in which most civilian victims were not simply bystanders on the street in the wrong place at the wrong time. As the Special Rapporteur heard time and again, most victims were families killed in missile strikes on their own homes, usually at night. Palestinian human rights defenders noted that some entire families, including the Najar and Abu Kaware families, were “simply wiped off the registries”.<\/p><\/div>\n 20.\t<\/span>In the non-exhaustive list of cases brought to the attention of the Special Rapporteur, almost all of the families listed lost one or more infants or children, killed in attacks on their homes. In some cases, pregnant women and elderly persons were also killed. This non-exhaustive list includes the following names: Al-Haj, Al-Batsh, Al-Awdat, Shuheebar, Abu Jarad, Al-Hallaq, Ammar, Abu Jame’ Siyam, Al-Qassas, Abu Eeta, Al-Najjar, Al-Helu, Abu Jaber, Abu Khousa, Abu Zaid, Duhair, Al-Hashash, Abu ‘Amer, Breeker, Mu’ammar, Balata, Al-Khalili, Al-Bayoumi, Al-Farra, Abu Suleiman, Abu Madi, Al Ghoul, Al-Majdalawi, Abu Nijm-Al Masri, Al-Bakri, Uwaida, Wandan, Al-Dalu, Al-Louh, Kellab, Abu Dahrouj, Mheesin, Joudeh and Tanboura. Overall, at least 999 family members were reportedly killed inside their houses, including 329 children. A further 233 people were killed in the vicinity of their houses, in some cases while attempting to flee.<\/span>14<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 21.\t<\/span>The most recent round of conflict was in fact far deadlier for children than the previous hostilities in 2008 and 2009 and in 2012. On average, 10 children died every day over a period of 50 days — an appalling statistic by any measure, which cannot be dismissed as collateral damage. According to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA, the conflict over the summer resulted in up to 1,500 new orphans, including at least 560 Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA students, who were in need of sustained child protection and welfare support. Palestinian human rights organizations described the reported high civilian toll as “a direct consequence of Israel’s large scale, deliberate and systematic military attacks against family homes”. All the information received to date by the Special Rapporteur supports the validity of this claim.<\/p><\/div>\n 22.\t<\/span>Israel has justified its use of force against civilian infrastructure by noting that Palestinian armed groups had fired rockets indiscriminately from the above-mentioned facilities.<\/span>15<\/sup><\/span> However, the testimonies heard by the Special Rapporteur from human rights defenders and victims from Gaza, collaborated by the sheer scale of destruction that can be seen in satellite imagery made available by the United Nations, raises serious questions as to whether the Israel Defense Forces adhered to principles of proportionality and distinction.<\/span>16<\/sup><\/span> It is also relevant to recall that the High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention affirmed in its declaration of 17 December 2014 that “no violation of international humanitarian law by any party to a conflict can relieve the other party from its own obligations under international humanitarian law”.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 23.\t<\/span>Long after the ceasefire, unexploded remnants of war continue to pose a threat, particularly to children in Gaza. It is estimated that 7,000 unexploded ordinances are still littered across the Gaza Strip under the rubble and debris of flattened neighbourhoods. At the end of October 2014, the United Nations Mine Action Service reported at least seven civilian fatalities as a result of unexploded remnants of war, and 14 others injured.<\/span>17<\/sup><\/span> In the latest such incident, on 4 December 2014, four Palestinian women, including three children, were reportedly injured (two of them with serious shrapnel wounds) at the home of the Abu Mer’ie family when one family member picked up an oddly shaped piece of metal. The family had just returned to their house in the al-Zaytoun neighbourhood in Gaza City a few days earlier in order to carry out repairs.<\/span>18<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 24.\t<\/span>In August 2014, the Special Rapporteur addressed a letter of allegation to the Government of Israel on emblematic cases of alleged disproportionate or indiscriminate attacks that had resulted in the killing of innocent civilians, including children. While no response to the letter had been received as at 9 December 2014, the Military Advocate General ordered a number of cases to be closed, including one of the cases raised by the Special Rapporteur together with the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions regarding the killing of two disabled Palestinian women at a care centre in Beit Lahiya on 12 July 2014.<\/span>19<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n E.\t<\/span>Right to health<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n 25.\t<\/span>According to the Palestinian Ministry of Heath, more than 11,100 Palestinians, including 3,374 children, were injured during the hostilities in July and August 2014.<\/span>20<\/sup><\/span> Ministry officials noted that an estimated 3,500 patients were admitted to hospital requiring surgical interventions. Many Palestinians, including children, are now struggling with life-long disabilities. An estimated 30 per cent of children in Gaza were exposed to high levels of traumatic stress. Tens of thousands of men, women and children live with the trauma of having witnessed the horrific killings of family members, friends and neighbours before their own eyes.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 26.\t<\/span>Health professionals based in Gaza recounted to the Special Rapporteur that, while treating dozens of patients every day in the emergency ward, the hospitals where they worked also came under attack from Israeli airstrikes and shelling. A representative of the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that 75 hospitals, primary health centres and clinics were damaged and in need of repair or maintenance. One hospital (Al Wafa) and five other primary health centres had been totally destroyed, while two others and five clinics had sustained major damage; 63 health-care facilities suffered minor damage. In one attack, on 19 July, the Shuhada al-Aqsa hospital in central Gaza was hit by multiple rounds of tank shells, reportedly killing one patient, a nurse and three medical staffers. The same attack destroyed the operating theatres and life support units of the hospital, severely hampering its ability to care for patients.<\/p><\/div>\n 27.\t<\/span>The right to health for the population in Gaza during the conflict was affected not only by direct hits on hospitals and medical facilities (a total of 23 medical personnel were reportedly killed), but also as a result of the lack of access to medical facilities. Health professionals pointed out that the precarious security conditions made it difficult for staff and patients alike to reach hospitals and clinics. Access was reportedly severely limited to an estimated 60 per cent of primary health centres, while some 30 per cent of medical personnel had no regular access to their workplaces. Palestinian doctors also explained to the Special Rapporteur that treating patients with pre-existing health conditions had been complicated by the loss of patient records, destroyed following airstrikes on medical facilities.<\/p><\/div>\n 28.\t<\/span>Around 600 patients were reportedly referred for treatment outside of Gaza, including in hospitals in the West Bank, Egypt, Jordan, Turkey and Germany, given the lack of medical equipment and specialised doctors available in Gaza. In September 2014, many of these patients from Gaza were still being treated abroad, separated from their families in a foreign environment in need of continuous monitoring following surgical interventions. These relatively fortunate patients accounted for, however, only a fraction of the thousands of Palestinians in need of treatment unavailable within Gaza, but not granted permits by Israel to leave the territory. Palestinian doctors and health professionals in Gaza explained that the inadequacy of their own medical facilities and the lack of trained specialists were a consequence of the years of blockade that prohibited the import of potential “dual-use” materials and the travel restrictions imposed by the Israeli authorities that prevented young doctors and medical personnel from receiving advanced medical training abroad.<\/p><\/div>\n 29.\t<\/span>In such circumstances, Palestinian health specialists pointed out that the presence of a number of foreign doctors in Gaza during the conflict had helped considerably, but could not compensate for the inadequate facilities available in Gaza. According to health specialists in Gaza, the medical equipment most needed included radioscopy, ultrascan and optical equipment, as well as drugs, vaccines and other basic disposables, such as gloves and gauze. The electricity crisis that resulted from the strike on the only power station in Gaza on 29 July, during Israeli military operations, also weighed heavily on the provision of health care, as back-up generators were pushed to the limit.<\/p><\/div>\n 30.\t<\/span>On 21 September 2014, the Special Rapporteur visited King Hussein hospital in Amman where a number of Palestinian patients from Gaza were being treated. One young Palestinian woman had been injured when three Israeli missiles hit her family home near Khan Younis without any warning on the evening of 8 July 2014. Her three brothers and grandmother were killed instantly, and a total of 12 family members suffered injuries. She suffered further injuries when the ambulance, which was evacuating her, was hit on route to the hospital, resulting in a serious injury to her hip and shrapnel injuries across her body.<\/p><\/div>\n 31.\t<\/span>The Special Rapporteur also met with a 14 year-old girl from Beit Hanoun, who lost both her legs and suffered shrapnel wounds and internal injuries when, on 25 July 2014, an Israeli strike hit a Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA school, which was being used as a shelter. Her distraught father recounted that she had lost her mother and three brothers in the same attack. According to his testimony, they had decided to evacuate their home a week after the start of hostilities. They first sought shelter at Beit Hanoun hospital, but had moved on to the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA school serving as an emergency shelter, which they thought a safe haven. Despite the visible pain on the girl’s face, she expressed her eagerness to return to school, and shared her dream: “One day, I want to become a teacher”. Children with conflict-inflicted disabilities will certainly require long-term care and support at both school and home. Doctors, health professionals and teachers all highlighted the long-term consequences for the population at large.<\/p><\/div>\n 32.\t<\/span>Community health workers in Gaza informed the Special Rapporteur that they were already dealing with many new cases of children suffering from bedwetting, difficulties in sleeping, nightmares, panic attacks, speech problems, a loss of appetite and alienation from parents. Among other recent fmdings, the Special Rapporteur received an increasing number of reports of physical violence against children within their families and communities occurring in the context of increased stress faced by parents and relatives. There were also reportedly cases of sexual abuse, particularly of adolescent girls in shelters and in host communities.<\/span>21<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 33.\t<\/span>Israel reportedly justified its strikes on schools and hospitals in Gaza by claiming that militants were firing rockets from inside those premises; according to the Palestinian doctors from Gaza who spoke with the Special Rapporteur, no rockets had been fired from within hospitals. The doctors added that, in any case, they should not be punished for what occurred in the vicinity of hospitals.<\/p><\/div>\n F.\t<\/span>Right to education<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n 34.\t<\/span>Two months of Israeli military operations in Gaza also had a profound impact on access to education and disrupted schooling for children in Gaza. A total of 228 schools (approximately one third) of all schools, including 83 Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA schools, were damaged during the attacks; 26 schools were totally destroyed or damaged beyond repair. Schools in Gaza reopened three weeks late, on 14 September 2014, and began with an initial period of psychosocial support and recreational activities for children.<\/span>22<\/sup><\/span> With on average only one counsellor per school, however, education experts in Gaza raised concerns about the shortage of trained teachers qualified to offer adequate psychosocial support to children. Education specialists added that teachers themselves had been victims of traumatic experience and would also require appropriate support.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 35.\t<\/span>According to the Education Cluster, which brings together non-governmental organizations, United Nations agencies, academics and other partners under the shared goal of ensuring predictable, well-coordinated and equitable provision of education for populations affected by humanitarian crises, attendance at the start of the year was mixed as a result of the massive internal displacement of Palestinian families Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA and Government-run schools allowed the transfer of displaced students to schools closer to their current places of residence, but some 87 schools were still operating double shifts. A number of teachers expressed concerns that overcrowded classrooms of up to 60 pupils affected the quality of education. Education specialists also pointed out that many of the schools that served as shelters during the conflict had valuable equipment damaged or missing.<\/p><\/div>\n 36.\t<\/span>Schools in Gaza are already reportedly seeing more aggressive behaviour in pupils, while mental health specialists have warned that the traumatic events experienced by children during the conflict would have a lasting impact on cognitive development and have broader social implications. Community health workers also expressed concern that, in some children, their traumatic experience could nurture a desire for revenge. It was also unclear whether schools would be able to cope with any influx of disabled children requiring specialized educational assistance.<\/p><\/div>\n 37.\t<\/span>In Gaza, the higher education sector, which serves up to 95,000 students, was also seriously affected by the hostilities. Many of the 28 higher education institutions in Gaza were damaged during the conflict. The hostilities also affected the number of new enrolments for the new term. Education specialists noted, however, that the blockade was also responsible for changing the views of parents about the value of investing in higher education for their children in the context of perpetually high unemployment rates and the lack of job prospects for highly qualified graduates. Schools moreover lacked essential equipment and resources to motivate students and were unable to offer opportunities for academic exchanges or to bring in foreign expertise to contribute to the development of students.<\/p><\/div>\n G.\t<\/span>Recovery and reconstruction efforts<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n 38.\t<\/span>The rebuilding of lives and livelihoods following intensive bombardment, mortar fire and ground operations across Gaza is a momentous task that will continue for some time to come. The Palestinian Government of National Consensus reportedly estimated the cost of relief, recovery and reconstruction for Gaza at $4 billion. The international community pledged up to $5.4 billion for Gaza reconstruction at the donor conference held in Cairo in October 2014, but many pledges have not been fulfilled. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA had estimated the total funding required for the provision of rental subsidies to families with no alternative shelter, reconstruction of destroyed homes and repair for those with damage at $720 million; as at December 2014, however, only $100 million had been pledged, leaving a shortfall of $620 million According to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA, the impact of ceasing payments to affected families would be dramatic, forecasting that tens of thousands of refugee families would find themselves with inadequate shelter and no support during the harshest months of winter. <\/span>23<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n 39.\t<\/span>Some 100,000 people remain displaced and in need of continuing assistance; 450,000 are disconnected from the water network owing to damage and\/or low pressure, while approximately 22,000 housing units require rebuilding or substantial repair. Despite the Gaza reconstruction mechanism brokered by the United Nations and that came into effect in early November, the delivery of essential building materials has been painfully slow. Four months after the ceasefire and with the onset of winter, the United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process conceded, during a visit to Gaza in December 2014, that the operating environment continued to face many challenges, including a fragile and informal ceasefire that had not yet solidified and a lack of empowerment of the Government of National Consensus in Gaza with no control over the crossings. Such difficult issues, coupled with insufficient financial assistance from donors, had only worsened the atmosphere in an already devastated Gaza. As the Special Coordinator stated during his briefing to the Security Council a few days later, “this temporary mechanism is not a substitute for the lifting of all closures on Gaza as laid out in Security Council resolution 1860 (2009)”.<\/span>24<\/sup><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n
\nof human rights in the Palestinian territories
\noccupied since 1967, Makarim Wibisono<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n\n
\n \n
\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n<\/p><\/div>\n