  {"id":297681,"date":"2024-06-26T09:15:38","date_gmt":"2024-06-26T13:15:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/?post_type=document&#038;p=297681"},"modified":"2024-06-27T11:33:31","modified_gmt":"2024-06-27T15:33:31","slug":"un-palestinian-rights-committee-meeting-26june2024","status":"publish","type":"document","link":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/document\/un-palestinian-rights-committee-meeting-26june2024\/","title":{"rendered":"As More Governments Recognize State of Palestine, Crucial to Keep Focus on Political Horizon, Implementing Ceasefire, Palestine&#8217;s Permanent Observer Tells Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Palestinian Rights Committee"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>26 June 2024<\/p>\n<div class=\"layout__region layout__region--first\">\n<div class=\"block block-layout-builder block-field-block-node-press-field-meeting-info\">\n<div class=\"block-content\">\n<div class=\"field field--name-field-meeting-info field--type-string field--label-hidden\">\n<div class=\"field__items\">\n<div>\n<p class=\"fusion-title-heading title-heading-left fusion-responsive-typography-calculated\" style=\"text-align: center\">Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"field__item\" style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/417th-committee-meeting-26-june-2024\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">417TH MEETING (PM)<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"layout__region layout__region--second\">\n<div class=\"block block-layout-builder block-field-block-node-press-field-symbol\">\n<div class=\"block-content\">\n<div class=\"field field--name-field-symbol field--type-string field--label-hidden\">\n<div class=\"field__items\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3><strong>Citing Overwhelming Evidence of Systematic Discrimination, Norms Violations, International Public Law Expert Discusses Critical Pending Case at The Hague\u00a0<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>As more States recognize the State of Palestine and agree that it should become a full member at the United Nations, it is crucial to keep an eye on the political horizon, even amidst the current violence, the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People heard today.<\/p>\n<p>Riyad H. Mansour, Permanent Observer for the State of Palestine, updating the Committee on the latest developments, highlighted the collective effort of the last nine months in trying to bring an end to the genocidal war against the people of Gaza. \u00a0\u201cWe did not succeed yet in having a permanent ceasefire,\u201d he said; nevertheless, a significant resolution was adopted recently, which begins with a six-week ceasefire and exchange of prisoners, detainees and hostages. \u00a0This should be the first stage of a permanent ceasefire and should lead to the total withdrawal of Israel from every part of Gaza, he said.\u00a0That text was adopted by 14\u00a0votes in favor in the Security Council with only 1\u00a0abstention, so \u201calmost by consensus\u201d, he said, asking for support from all States, especially Council members, to push for its implementation.<\/p>\n<p>Noting the increasing unity around the Palestinian position, he highlighted meetings with several Governments in the Caribbean in April and May, and said it led to the recognition of the State of Palestine by Barbados, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, and the Bahamas. \u00a0Thus, all 14\u00a0countries from the Caribbean have recognized the State of Palestine, he said, adding that letters have been sent to the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ\u00a0Secretary-General to inform all Member States of this.\u00a0 \u201cThis wave in the Caribbean was followed by another wave in Western Europe,\u201d he said adding that this is significant because, with the exception of Sweden, there has not been recognition for the State of Palestine in that region since\u00a02011. \u00a0The second wave was led by Spain, which was followed by Ireland, Norway, Slovenia and Armenia, he added.<\/p>\n<p>Pointing to a forthcoming trip to Asia, he said it will be focused on New Zealand, Australia, Japan and Republic of Korea. \u00a0All four of these countries voted in favour of the Assembly resolution recommending statehood for Palestine, while Japan and Republic of Korea, both Council members, voted in favour of it in the Council, as well. \u00a0If all four countries recognize the State of Palestine, it would bring the total number doing so to\u00a0149 and \u201cthat would make it more difficult for the one country that caused the veto to deny us our natural and legal right to be admitted as a Member State\u201d, he added. \u00a0From thereon, the focus will be on the political horizon, he said, adding that the increasing recognition for the State of Palestine must lead to the implementation of the global consensus on the two-State solution.<\/p>\n<p>Also addressing the Committee today was Paul S. Reichler, public international law expert and Counsel to the State of Palestine at the Hague.\u00a0 Stating that there are three critical pending cases related to Palestine, he noted the case brought by South Africa against Israel, as well as the International Criminal Court Prosecutor\u2019s request for arrest warrants against leaders of Israel and Hamas for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed since 7\u00a0October\u00a02023. \u00a0The third pending case is the one in which he is involved, he said, noting that it was initiated in December\u00a02022 by the General Assembly when it sought an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice concerning the legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.<\/p>\n<div class=\"video-shortcode\"><iframe title=\"Israel&#039;s occupation of the Palestinian territory is illegal, arues Paul S. Reichler\" width=\"1320\" height=\"743\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/H1ahDUkRqg4?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p>This case has a much broader scope than the other two in \u201cterritory, time and actions,\u201d he pointed out. \u00a0It concerns not just Gaza, but the entire territory of occupied Palestine, he said, adding that its timeline begins in June\u00a01967. \u00a0The scope of actions is also broader, covering the entirety of the occupation, from human rights violations to annexation, settlements and the implementation of a system of racial discrimination that sets up two classes of human beings: \u00a0Israeli Jewish settlers, who enjoy full rights, and Palestinians, who are indigenous to their own land and enjoy no internationally guaranteed human rights. \u00a0This can only be accurately described as \u201capartheid\u201d he stressed, noting that both South African Bishop Desmond Tutu and former President Nelson Mandela \u2014 whose authority on the question of apartheid cannot be questioned \u2014 described the situation thus.<\/p>\n<p>Noting that the case contains two separate questions regarding the legality of the prolonged occupation and the legal consequences arising from that, he said a record number of States participated in written submission and in the oral hearings held in February\u00a02023.\u00a0 While the Court has not yet given a date when its opinion will be issued, it is anticipated in July.\u00a0 Turning to the substance of the case, he said Israel\u2019s occupation is illegal due to its violation of at least three peremptory international norms. \u00a0First, it is an unlawful acquisition of territory by force in violation of Article\u00a02(4) of the United Nations Charter and customary international law. \u00a0Secondly, the prolonged occupation has resulted in the denial of the fundamental right of self-determination of the Palestinian people in their own territory.\u00a0 Finally, the systematic racial, ethnic and religious discrimination, tantamount to apartheid, deprives Palestinians of their fundamental human rights, he added.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe evidence is overwhelming and undisputable, and of the highest probative value,\u201d he said, noting the abundance of reports by the Secretary-General, various Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ rapporteurs and fact-finding missions. \u00a0Scores of Council and Assembly resolutions establish the violations clearly, he said, also pointing to official statements by senior Israeli officials.\u00a0 Reading out some such statements, he described them as \u201cadmissions against interest\u201d. \u00a0Forty-seven States and international organizations, among them Switzerland, France, African Union, Brazil and Japan, made statements supporting Palestine at the oral hearings, he said. \u00a0Israel chose not to participate in the oral proceedings, and five participating States made adverse statements, but \u201cnot a single one\u201d argued that the occupation was lawful. \u00a0Instead, they argued that the Court should not answer the Assembly\u2019s questions because it would have a negative impact on negotiations between Israel and Palestine. \u00a0The main exponents of this view were the United States and the United Kingdom, he added. \u00a0\u201cWhen other States heard this,\u201d he said, there was a robust rebuttal, starting with: \u00a0\u201cWhat negotiations?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Several States, he said, highlighted Israel\u2019s refusal to negotiate and the current Prime Minister\u2019s emphatic declarations that he will never accept the existence of an independent Palestinian State. \u00a0They also emphasized that a clarification from the Court on the legal rights and obligations of the parties can only help, not hinder, good-faith negotiations. \u00a0Also noting a precedent in the case of the United Kingdom\u2019s prolonged occupation of the Chagos Archipelago, he noted the interaction between the Court and the Assembly concerning the decolonization of Mauritius. \u00a0An Assembly resolution following the Court\u2019s advisory opinion next month could set a date for its implementation, he said. \u00a0Such a resolution must be taken as soon as possible after the opinion is issued, he said, adding that it could renew the call to admit the State of Palestine as a Member State.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Reicher and Mr.\u00a0Mansour then responded to questions and statements. \u00a0The representative of T\u00fcrkiye expressed support and recalled the oral hearing. \u00a0The representative of Namibia asked how best to implement the advisory opinion in a world where people have lost trust in multilateralism.<\/p>\n<p>In response, Mr.\u00a0Reichler said that this is the most difficult time for international lawyers. \u00a0\u201cEven though I am just one lawyer, I want to do what I can,\u201d he said, adding that the Palestinian cause is one of the most just and noble causes on the planet. \u00a0Advisory opinions are not judgements, he said, and the international community must create the conditions that will demonstrate to the recalcitrant State that it is in its own best interests to implement them.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe learn from Namibia, South Africa, Mauritius\u201d, and other decolonization struggles, Mr.\u00a0Mansour said. \u00a0\u201cWhen I was a young diplomat,\u201d he recalled, his seat was often next to that of the African National Congress. \u00a0\u201cThey used to think the PLO [Palestine Liberation Organization] was way ahead of them\u201d in accomplishing the shared objective of decolonization, he said, but in fact, the African struggle bore fruit first. \u00a0Outlining the long and careful trajectory of study, analysis, waiting and alliance-building that led to the Assembly resolution requesting the advisory opinion, he said it will be one more tool in the decolonization arsenal of Palestine.<\/p>\n<p>The Committee also elected Ernesto Sober\u00f3n Guzm\u00e1n\u00a0(Cuba) as Vice-Chair, following the departure of the former Permanent Representative of that country. Since he could not attend the meeting for medical reasons, the charg\u00e9 d&#8217;affaires of the Mission spoke on his behalf, stressing that the Palestinian cause is important for the people of Cuba. \u00a0Nothing can justify the savagery being perpetrated against the people of Gaza, he said, adding that it is unacceptable that the Council does not comply with its own resolutions to put an end to Israel\u2019s crimes.\u00a0Expressing support for the dispute initiated by South Africa in the International Court of Justice, he said Cuba will present as a third State.<\/p>\n<p>Cheikh Niang (Senegal), Committee Chair, provided an overview of its activities, noting, among others, its participation in various meetings, as well as the delegation it sent to various Caribbean countries. \u00a0Highlighting a symposium on Jerusalem to take place in Jeddah, he noted that the Division for Palestinian Rights has continued to issue its newsletters.\u00a0 In other business, the Chair also encouraged all delegates to express support to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East\u00a0(Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµRWA).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; 26 June 2024 Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµ Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People 417TH MEETING (PM) Citing Overwhelming Evidence of Systematic Discrimination, Norms Violations, International Public Law Expert Discusses Critical Pending Case at The Hague\u00a0 &nbsp; As more States recognize the State of Palestine and agree that it should become a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/document\/un-palestinian-rights-committee-meeting-26june2024\/\"> [&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":299,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"country":[],"document-category":[1329],"document-source":[1753,2173,1365],"committee-meeting":[],"document-subject":[2517,1769,1861,2005,1741,1801,6879,2185,1749,1629,1745],"entity":[1729],"document-language":[6542],"class_list":["post-297681","document","type-document","status-publish","hentry","document-category-press-release","document-source-ceirpp","document-source-division-for-palestinian-rights-dpr","document-source-general-assembly","document-subject-access-and-movement","document-subject-armed-conflict","document-subject-fourth-geneva-convention","document-subject-gaza-strip","document-subject-human-rights-and-international-humanitarian-law","document-subject-inalienable-rights-of-the-palestinian-people","document-subject-israeli-settlements","document-subject-legal-issues","document-subject-palestine-question","document-subject-palestines-application-for-un-membership","document-subject-refugees-and-displaced-persons","entity-united-nations-system","document-language-english"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document\/297681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/document"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/299"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document\/297681\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":297725,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document\/297681\/revisions\/297725"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=297681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/country?post=297681"},{"taxonomy":"document-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document-category?post=297681"},{"taxonomy":"document-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document-source?post=297681"},{"taxonomy":"committee-meeting","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/committee-meeting?post=297681"},{"taxonomy":"document-subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document-subject?post=297681"},{"taxonomy":"entity","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/entity?post=297681"},{"taxonomy":"document-language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/document-language?post=297681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}