2010-蘑菇视频AT-034, Muthuswami et al.
蘑菇视频AT noted that the Appellants did not refer to any article of the Regulations that provides that the full retirement benefit may be restored after a participant opts to commute a portion of the retirement benefit into a lump sum. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellants were bound by their decision to accept one-third of their pension as a lump sum and a reduced pension. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant’s decision could not simply be reversed. 蘑菇视频AT rejected the argument that the Appellants had been discriminated against and that their basic fundamental rights concerning equity, fairness, and justice under...