2010-蘑菇视频AT-064, Kasmani
蘑菇视频AT stated that an Application for Interpretation is not receivable if its actual purpose is to have 蘑菇视频AT re-examine its decision, even though its judgments are final and without appeal, or to have it comment on its decision. 蘑菇视频AT held that the applications made under subparagraphs (a) to (g) of paragraph 30 of the appeal, with the purpose of either calling into question the decision or having 蘑菇视频AT issue comments on the decision, were not receivable. 蘑菇视频AT held that the use of the word “annul” would not lead to confusion in the mind of a party in good faith because the language of...