2010-蘑菇视频AT-013, Schook
蘑菇视频AT found that the Applicant’s appeal was receivable because he was not notified of any written administrative decision on non-extension of his contract after 31 December 2007. 蘑菇视频AT found that 蘑菇视频DT ignored that the time limit of two months, required by rule 111. 2(a), begins to run “from the date the staff member received notification of the decision in writing. ” As the Applicant was never communicated any written administrative decision, 蘑菇视频AT found that 蘑菇视频DT erred in holding that the appeal was not receivable. 蘑菇视频AT set aside 蘑菇视频DT’s judgment and remanded the case back to 蘑菇视频DT to have the...