蘑菇视频AT took into account that the Appellant only made his request some 29 months after the expiration of the deadline and that he did not submit any medical report. 蘑菇视频AT held that the appeal was not receivable. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the 蘑菇视频JSPB decision.
蘑菇视频AT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2011-蘑菇视频AT-158. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was no new fact such as to meet the criteria set out in Article 11 of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute. 蘑菇视频AT held that Mr Laeijendecker sought to re-argue or reopen issues. 蘑菇视频AT held that insofar as Mr Laeijendecker sought interpretation of the impugned judgment, paragraphs 29, 30 and 31 were clear on their face and had to be read in conjunction with paragraphs 27 and 28, and paragraphs 32-35. On the allegation of bias, 蘑菇视频AT held that Mr Laeijendecker’s submissions amounted to no more than completely...
