2011-蘑菇视频AT-186, Oge
蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant’s claims regarding the termination of his appointment and the procedures that resulted in the termination could not be received since 蘑菇视频AT did not have jurisdiction to review a judgment of the former Administrative Tribunal. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT had committed no error in law by considering that the participation of the civil servant and his counsel in the hearing by video conference would not have violated the Appellant's rights of defence. 蘑菇视频AT held that, although the letter dated November 8, 2005, contained a sentence that could imply that, if the JDC requested...