2012-蘑菇视频AT-206, Liverakos
蘑菇视频AT considered the Appellant’s appeal. 蘑菇视频AT noted that, contrary to the Appellant’s contention, 蘑菇视频DT was not required to ascertain whether the closure of the Centre was a consequence of mismanagement or of any other factor since the primary purpose was not to get rid of the Appellant. 蘑菇视频AT found that 蘑菇视频DT did not fail to exercise its jurisdiction by not ascertaining whether the closure of the Centre was the result of serious mismanagement and irregularities. 蘑菇视频AT also found that the Appellant failed to submit sufficiently clear and convincing evidence that the desire to retaliate against him...