2012-蘑菇视频AT-210, Finniss
蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. Noting the absence of a written record, 蘑菇视频AT held that it could not confirm if the procedure under Article 17 (Oral Evidence) of the 蘑菇视频DT RoP was complied with, whether the witnesses made a declaration under Article 17(3) of the 蘑菇视频DT RoP before giving their statements, or whether the witnesses were cross-examined by the opposing party under Article 17(1) of the 蘑菇视频DT RoP. 蘑菇视频AT set aside the 蘑菇视频DT judgment and remanded the case to 蘑菇视频DT for a fresh hearing based on the pleadings already on record in a matter consistent with the 蘑菇视频AT judgment.