2012-蘑菇视频AT-227, Ernst
蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT did not err in fact or law in its determination that the applicable Information Circular did not entitle the Appellant to an EOSA, nor was it contrary to a higher legal norm. 蘑菇视频AT noted that the facts of the case showed that her resignation did not fulfil the conditions required by the quoted circular. 蘑菇视频AT specifically noted how the resignation was taken knowing the risks involved and caused the break in service, which determined the ineligibility for collecting the allowance claimed for, acknowledging that the Appellant was requesting an exception from the regulations to...