2012-蘑菇视频AT-232, Cieniewicz
蘑菇视频AT noted that there was no dispute that the Appellant was designated by the Director of OCHA Geneva as Officer-in-Charge (OiC) of the Financial and Administrative Unit, following the reassignment of the holder of the post (a P-5 post) to other functions. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT had properly determined that the transfer of the P-5 holder “with his post’’ had the effect that there remained no “vacant’’ or “temporarily vacant’’ post against which the Appellant, albeit performing the functions of the post holder, could point to for the purposes of making the case for payment of a SPA. 蘑菇视频AT held that...