2012-蘑菇视频AT-242, Charles
蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant had merely repeated his submissions before JAB and 蘑菇视频DT and while voicing his disagreement with the conclusions, he did not succeed to establish any errors committed by the 蘑菇视频DT. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant did not possess the relevant professional qualification. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT had not erred in affirming the JAB’s findings that the allegations of manipulation of the selection criteria were not well-founded and that the selection process was conducted in a proper manner. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT’s focus on the requirement of professional legal experience did not...