2012-蘑菇视频AT-263, Larkin
蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal of judgment No. 蘑菇视频DT/2011/179. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant had failed to demonstrate that 蘑菇视频DT erred in finding that there was no evidence of a conflict of interest or prejudice to his case. 蘑菇视频AT noted that 蘑菇视频DT has broad discretion to determine the admissibility of any evidence under Article 18. 1 of the 蘑菇视频DT RoP and that it had exercised its discretion in deciding not to admit the evidence because it lacked probative value. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT had correctly found there were no meaningful indicia of a conflict of interest involving the Chief of OSLA regarding the...