2012-蘑菇视频AT-265, Ljungdell
Regarding the allegations that 蘑菇视频DT erred in law, fact, and procedure and failed to exercise its jurisdiction in relation to her allegations of discrimination, 蘑菇视频AT held that the burden was on the Appellant to establish that the oral and documentary evidence, if admitted, would have led to different findings of fact, and changed the outcome of the case. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT had not erred in rejecting the Appellant’s allegations that she had been subjected to discrimination on the grounds of gender or based on her family responsibilities and her expressed desire to work part-time. Regarding the...