2013-蘑菇视频AT-351, Ghahremani
蘑菇视频AT considered Mr Gharemani’s request for revision of judgment No. 2011-蘑菇视频AT-171. 蘑菇视频AT held that the request was a disguised way to criticise the judgment or to expose grounds to disagree with it, following a style of cross-reference to other documents that made it mostly incomprehensible and indirectly violated the page limitation for such an application. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was no reason why Mr Gharemani could not have filed his petition for revision within 30 days of the discovery of the facts as provided for in Article 11(1) of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute. 蘑菇视频AT held that the request was time-barred...