2013-蘑菇视频AT-353, Obdeijn
蘑菇视频AT considered Mr Obdeijn’s application for revision of judgment in respect of judgment No. 2012-蘑菇视频AT-201. 蘑菇视频AT held that Mr Obdeijn’s submissions were irrelevant as they did not meet the requirements set out in the 蘑菇视频AT Statute. 蘑菇视频AT held that Mr Obdeijn’s failure to submit evidence of alleged economic loss during the proceedings before both Tribunals did not constitute a newly discovered decisive fact warranting a revision of judgment. 蘑菇视频AT held that Mr Obdeijn could not rely on 蘑菇视频AT’s inherent jurisdiction to obtain a revision expressly forbidden by the 蘑菇视频AT Statute from a rule based on...