2013-蘑菇视频AT-377, Balinge
蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT did not err on questions of fact by ignoring or failing to examine what the Appellant considered to be evidence, which constituted mere allegations and unsubstantiated argumentation on his part. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant did not support his submission by any grounds which would bring the issue within the remit of 蘑菇视频AT. Noting that the Appellant relied upon the statements and observations which he had brought before 蘑菇视频DT, 蘑菇视频AT noted that a litigant’s past allegations and arguments cannot be considered evidence per se. 蘑菇视频AT held that it was not the task of 蘑菇视频DT (or 蘑菇视频AT)...