2013-蘑菇视频AT-392, Maghari
蘑菇视频AT considered Mr Maghari’s application for revision of judgment No. 2010-蘑菇视频AT-039. 蘑菇视频AT held that the application was receivable ratione temporis. 蘑菇视频AT held that the grounds filed did not fall within Article 11(1) of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute and did not constitute a decisive fact which was, at the time the judgment was rendered, known to 蘑菇视频AT and to the party applying for revision. 蘑菇视频AT held that Mr Maghari merely disagreed with the 蘑菇视频AT decision and sought to reargue his appeal. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the application for revision.