2014-蘑菇视频AT-456, Pirnea
蘑菇视频AT considered both an application for Revision of judgment No. 2013-蘑菇视频AT-311 and a motion for confidentiality filed by Mr Pirnea. On the application for revision of judgment, 蘑菇视频AT held that Mr Pirnea did not set forth a new fact that was unknown to both him and 蘑菇视频AT at the time the judgment was rendered. Thus, his application did not come within the grounds for revision set forth in Article 11(1) of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute and Article 24 of the 蘑菇视频AT Rules of Procedure. On the motion for confidentiality, 蘑菇视频AT noted that the motion was late, and it was unlikely that confidentiality could be achieved...