2014-蘑菇视频AT-484, Abassa
蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal of judgment No. 蘑菇视频DT/2013/145. On the issue of whether 蘑菇视频DT erred in law in not receiving the Appellant’s application for revision of judgment, 蘑菇视频AT held that it did. 蘑菇视频AT noted that to import into Article 12(1) of the 蘑菇视频DT Statute the limitations presently advocated by 蘑菇视频DT, merely because of the inclusion of the word “executable,” would be unduly restrictive and tantamount to a denial of an already narrowly construed remedy and unduly circumscribe the right of access of staff members to 蘑菇视频DT. With respect to the merits of the application for revision, 蘑菇视频AT held that...