2015-蘑菇视频AT-577, Staedler
Noting that 蘑菇视频DT concluded that the Office of Staff Legal Assistance (OSLA) had provided the Appellant with legal assistance and that its refusal to provide legal representation was reasoned, appropriate, and did not breach any lawful obligations of OSLA, 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT did not err in law or fact or exceed its competence in reaching this conclusion. 蘑菇视频AT found no fault with 蘑菇视频DT’s rejection of the Appellant’s contention that OSLA had no discretionary authority. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT did not err in law or fact or exceed its competence in finding that the reasons for OSLA’s decision were...