2015-蘑菇视频AT-582, Kacan
蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT’s interpretation of the relevant jurisprudence was correct and that it did not commit any error in law. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT took care to examine the evidence in order to ascertain if, in fact, an express promise of renewal had been made to the Appellant. Noting that 蘑菇视频DT was unable to find any such evidence, 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant’s submissions regarding his work experience, duties, and responsibilities, functions of his duty station, and his interest in a renewal had no merit as grounds for an expectancy of renewal. 蘑菇视频AT held that it was satisfied that 蘑菇视频DT’s...