2015-蘑菇视频AT-597, Wu
蘑菇视频AT considered the Appellant’s claim that 蘑菇视频DT erred in procedure in the following ways: firstly, by denying his request to call a specific witness; secondly, by making allegedly conclusory remarks at the oral hearing; and, thirdly, by refusing to admit further evidence on discrimination and retaliation committed against him in 2014. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT did not commit any error of procedure so as to affect the outcome of the present case. 蘑菇视频AT noted that case management issues, including the question of whether to call a certain person to testify, remain within the discretion of 蘑菇视频DT and do...