2016-蘑菇视频AT-646, Dalgaard et al.
蘑菇视频AT held that the motion did not fulfil the requirements of Article 11 of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute, which provides that a revision must be based on the discovery of a decisive fact which was, at the time the judgment was rendered, unknown to 蘑菇视频AT and to the party applying for revision, always provided that such ignorance was not due to negligence. The Applicants were relying on Article 31. 1 of the RoP and not on Article 11 of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute. 蘑菇视频AT held that a rule could not supplant a statutory provision such as Article 11 and that Article 31. 1 only applied where there is no other expressly...