2016-蘑菇视频AT-651, Choi
蘑菇视频AT rejected the request for an oral hearing, finding it would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case according to Article 18. 1 of the 蘑菇视频DT RoP. 蘑菇视频AT noted that the judgment on revision being appealed was issued more than four years ago. 蘑菇视频AT held that the appeal was not receivable. On the merits, 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT had correctly dismissed the application for revision since no material elements according to 蘑菇视频AT RoP could be shown to support the application, such as a new fact which, at the time the judgment was rendered, was unknown to 蘑菇视频AT and the moving party. 蘑菇视频AT...