2016-蘑菇视频AT-658, Kutner
蘑菇视频AT held that the appeal concerned the interpretation of Article 35 of the 蘑菇视频JSPF Regulations. 蘑菇视频AT found that the Appellant wanted the Standing Committee to accept the period of contributory service with the Fund in order to calculate his own benefit but to take into account a different period vis-à-vis his former spouse. 蘑菇视频AT held that Articles 35bis and 22 of the 蘑菇视频JSPF Regulations were clear and that it could not distinguish where the text was clear. 蘑菇视频AT held that the same date would apply to the calculation of the Appellant’s benefits and the determination of whether his former spouse...