2016-蘑菇视频AT-681, Karseboom
蘑菇视频AT considered Mr Karseboom’s application for interpretation of judgment regarding 蘑菇视频AT’s judgment delivered on 30 October 2015, with respect to: (i) whether moral damages awarded by the 蘑菇视频DT were still payable; and (ii) whether the Appeals Tribunal required a medical board to be convened. 蘑菇视频AT found that Mr Karseboom failed to identify any sentences or words in the judgment that were unclear or ambiguous. 蘑菇视频AT accordingly dismissed the application for interpretation of judgment.