2017-蘑菇视频AT-772, Kadri
On the Appellant’s claim for his name not to appear in the 蘑菇视频AT judgment, 蘑菇视频AT held that, due to the fact that his name had been in the public domain for a long time as a result of the publication of many court documents related to his cases before 蘑菇视频DT and 蘑菇视频AT, it would be pointless to order redaction. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant failed to give any compelling reason as to why confidentiality should be granted and denied his request for confidentiality. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT fully and fairly considered the merits of his case and was in no doubt as to its substance. 蘑菇视频AT held that there was no...