2017-蘑菇视频AT-778, Faust
蘑菇视频AT rejected the argument that the written test should have been prepared by the Hiring Manager, and not the direct supervisor of the position. 蘑菇视频AT held, in agreement with the 蘑菇视频DT’s conclusion, that the Appellant had failed to show that the Hiring Manager’s intervention in the preparation of the written test resulted in her non-selection for the contested post. 蘑菇视频AT held that the Appellant’s claim was fully and fairly considered by 蘑菇视频DT. 蘑菇视频AT found no fault in 蘑菇视频DT’s finding that the design, conduct, and evaluation of the written test did not constitute a violation of the Appellant’s right...