2017-蘑菇视频AT-787, Auda
蘑菇视频AT considered an appeal by the staff member and an appeal by the Secretary-General. 蘑菇视频AT upheld both 蘑菇视频DT’s finding that the decision to close the investigation was improper as well as 蘑菇视频DT’s refusal to order rescission of that decision on account of the subject of the investigation having separated from the Organisation. 蘑菇视频AT, however, vacated 蘑菇视频DT’s moral damages award on the grounds that the staff member did not present any evidence, apart from his own unsworn testimony to support the claim. 蘑菇视频AT held that “generally speaking, the testimony of an applicant alone without corroboration by...