2019-蘑菇视频AT-949, Sheffer
蘑菇视频AT held that it was not satisfied that the essential elements were present to enable 蘑菇视频AT to exercise its jurisdiction within the meaning of Article 2(10) of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute in regard to the decision of IMO SAB. 蘑菇视频AT held that in this case, even if the SAB issued decision, it was nevertheless only advisory or recommendatory. 蘑菇视频AT noted that the SAB gave advice to the Secretary-General of IMO, who could not be regarded as a neutral part of the process as he is both the employer’s representative and the original decision-maker. 蘑菇视频AT held that it was the Secretary-General of IMO, who was not a...