2019-蘑菇视频AT-959, Wesslund
蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DT did not err in dismissing the application as not receivable ratione temporis. 蘑菇视频AT held that there had been no new administrative decision (capable of resetting the deadlines), but merely a reiteration of the previously communicated original decision. 蘑菇视频AT held that, with respect to the original decision, the Applicant did not file a request to 蘑菇视频DT to suspend or extend the deadlines for filing her application to 蘑菇视频DT, nor did she claim exceptional circumstances justifying a waiver of the time limits. 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 蘑菇视频DT judgment.