2020-蘑菇视频AT-1006, Suleiman
ngl蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频RWA DT did not err in law or fact in finding that the facts on which the disciplinary measure was based had been established. 蘑菇视频AT agreed with 蘑菇视频RWA DT that the preponderance of the evidence showed that the Appellant hit a student forcefully on the back during the 25 October 2016 distribution of school bags. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频RWA DT did not err in relying on the testimony of the Donor Relations Officer (DRO), which is of high value. 蘑菇视频AT noted that he was a neutral witness without any personal interest in the matter and he did not know the Appellant before. 蘑菇视频AT held that...