2021-蘑菇视频AT-1131, Mohammed Sirhan
The staff member submits that the “decisive fact” which was unknown to him and to the Appeals Tribunal was the erroneous interpretation and application from case to case of Article 10(5) of the 蘑菇视频RWA DT Statute, Regulation 11.3 of the 蘑菇视频RWA International Staff Regulations and Article 9(1)(a) of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute. 蘑菇视频AT disagreed that a variance in the interpretation or application of the law from case to case constitute a “decisive fact” that would warrant revision. The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that it did not meet the statutory requirements and that it was in fact a disguised...