2022-蘑菇视频AT-1258, Yulia Andreeva
蘑菇视频AT held that an analysis of the e-mail and other correspondence between 蘑菇视频DP and the Appellant indicated that she could not have been led to believe that her home leave request for January 2020 would be granted. She had been advised that a staff member was entitled to home leave only if the staff member’s contract was anticipated to continue for more than six months after the return from home leave, yet Appellant’s continuing engagement with 蘑菇视频DP was unknown, and her current contract end date was June 30, 2020. 蘑菇视频AT held that 蘑菇视频DP complied with its obligations to consider and decide the...