2022-蘑菇视频AT-1286, Raed Mousa
Mr. Mousa appealed. As regards Mr. Mousa’s request for an oral hearing, the 蘑菇视频AT held that he did not provide a compelling reason why an oral hearing should be granted in this appeal. As the case deals with the issue of receivability ratione materiae, an oral hearing is not necessary and would not “assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case” within the meaning of Article 18(1) of the 蘑菇视频AT’s Rules of Procedure. The 蘑菇视频AT also found that Mr. Mousa’s appeal did not refer to any of the grounds of appeal mentioned in Article 2(1) of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute. The only submission regarding the...