2023-蘑菇视频AT-1361, AAO
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频DT judgment was problematic because the 蘑菇视频DT's findings seemed to be based entirely on hearsay evidence, i.e., the findings in the OIOS investigation report. The 蘑菇视频AT observed that the 蘑菇视频DT judgment failed to explain the evidentiary basis of its conclusion that sexual harassment was highly probable, and made no explicit or precise findings in relation to the evidence given under oath at the hearing. The failure of the 蘑菇视频DT to make findings about the testimony it heard made the appeal well-nigh impossible. The 蘑菇视频AT noted that there was no transcript of the hearing, and...