2024-蘑菇视频AT-1411, AAU
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the staff member’s attempts to reargue her case failed to identify any reviewable error in the 蘑菇视频DT Judgment, warranting alone dismissal of her appeal. In any event, regardless of the merits of her claim, the 蘑菇视频AT found that her application was time-barred under Article 8(4) of the 蘑菇视频DT Statute since she filed it 27 years after her receipt of the contested decision. Recalling that there is no authority given to either tribunal to extend time limits in these circumstances, the 蘑菇视频AT concluded that the 蘑菇视频DT was correct to conclude that her application was not receivable.
The...