2024-蘑菇视频AT-1438, Ann-Christin Raschdorf
The 蘑菇视频AT dismissed the application for revision, finding that none of the alleged new facts were “new facts” for the purpose of Article 11(1) of the 蘑菇视频AT Statute. The alleged new facts either occurred after the issuance of the 蘑菇视频AT Judgment, were known to the Appeals Tribunal, or matters of law.
The 蘑菇视频AT granted the application for correction in part, to the extent that the 蘑菇视频AT agreed with Ms. Raschdorf's argument that an error arose in paragraph 44 of the 蘑菇视频AT Judgment where the 蘑菇视频AT wrongly referred to the Advisory Board on Compensation Claims instead of the Pension Fund.
Finally, the...