2024-蘑菇视频AT-1443, Ahmad Shukri Safi
The 蘑菇视频AT held that Mr. Safi failed to discharge his burden in identifying in what respect and for what reasons the 蘑菇视频RWA DT erred in its Judgment. Mr. Safi merely reiterated the same arguments that he had presented in his application to the 蘑菇视频RWA DT. The 蘑菇视频AT stated that it is not its role to reexamine the staff member’s case anew, and accordingly, his appeal must fail. The 蘑菇视频AT also observed that the 蘑菇视频RWA DT drew reasonable inferences from its extensive fact-finding exercise and delivered a well-reasoned judgment.
The appeal was dismissed, and Judgment No. 蘑菇视频RWA/DT/2023/011 was...