2024-蘑菇视频AT-1485, Betty Mukomah
The 蘑菇视频AT noted that the applicant had filed the application for revision some three months after she became aware of the decisive facts as identified in the application. The 蘑菇视频AT held that the application had been filed beyond the 30-day time limit and was, therefore, not receivable.
The 蘑菇视频AT found that, in any event, one of the documents had not been in existence at the time of the 蘑菇视频AT Judgment. The 蘑菇视频AT also noted that the document had not been decisive in reaching a decision in the appeal and, for this reason, the application was an attempt to re-litigate the appeal. The 蘑菇视频AT concluded...