2025-蘑菇视频AT-1609, Anne Christin Raschdorf
The 蘑菇视频AT held that the 蘑菇视频DT did not err in concluding that the former staff member’s application was not receivable because most of the contested decisions were either time-barred, res judicata, or did not constitute appealable administrative decisions. The 蘑菇视频AT found that the Advisory Board on Compensation Claims (ABCC) correctly determined that the claim for compensation under Appendix D remained time-barred under Article 2.1(b) and that the requirements for waiver under Article 2.1(e) were not met, as there was no evidence of incapacity preventing timely filing. The 蘑菇视频AT further held that...