蘑菇视频DT/2019/121, Alex?, Arora et al.?, Chatuverdi et al.?, Daniel et al. and Kapoor et al.
Concerning receivability ratione temporis, the Tribunal found the applications receivable ratione temporis in view that 1) it did not process the Applicants’ 2014/2015 motions for extension of time, thus did not include in its March and June 2015 adjudication of similar cases and 2) in light of 蘑菇视频AT’s reversal of the 蘑菇视频DT’s March and June 2015 judgments. Concerning receivability ratione materiae, the Tribunal considered the fact that the Applicants did not request management evaluation on the grounds that the decision had been taken by a technical body. In this connection, the Tribunal noted...