With respect to the first contested selection process, the 蘑菇视频DT found that the Applicant was properly considered for it but was determined as not suitable. With respect to the second contested selection process, the 蘑菇视频DT found that the Respondent’s explanation that the post was not filled due to reasons not related to the Applicant’s candidacy was credible. The 蘑菇视频DT rejected the application.
Regarding the first administrative decision, the Respondent submitted that this claim was time-barred because the Applicant had failed to request management evaluation of the contested decision in a timely manner even though the Management Evaluation Unit (“MEU”) had actually granted the Applicant leave to file the request after the time limit had already expired; a decision which the Under-Secretary-General of Management had subsequently affirmed in the management evaluation letter. As for the second administrative decision, the Respondent contended that the claim in relation to the relevant...
