Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the services provided by OSLA and the way the representation is implemented can have an impact on a staff member¡¯s terms of employment and can therefore fall within the jurisdiction of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT, without interfering with the professional independence of counsel. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the decision taken by the former Chief of OSLA not to disclose a potential conflict of interest in the staff member¡¯s case could have an impact on his terms of employment and, therefore, constituted an administrative decision subject to review by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT reversed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment and remanded the case to Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT for a trial on the merits.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The staff member contested the decision taken by the former Chief of OSLA not to disclose a potential conflict of interest in his case. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT rejected the staff member¡¯s application, holding that the alleged omission was not an administrative decision subject to review by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT.
Legal Principle(s)
The services provided by OSLA and the way the representation is implemented can have an impact on a staff member¡¯s terms of employment and therefore constitute an administrative decision subject to review by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT.