Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT affirmed the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT order denying revision. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that a change in law is not a ¡°fact¡± contemplated by Article 12. 1 of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Statute. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the issuance of new jurisprudence by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT is an issue of law, not of fact.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Order: The Secretary-General submitted an application with Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT for revision of its judgment, under Article 29 of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT RoP. The Secretary-General considered the new decision of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT to fix the interest rate applicable to pre-judgment compensation at the US prime rate to be a ¡°decisive fact¡± which was unknown at the time of the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment. The Secretary-General maintained that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT¡¯s award of eight per cent rate on the pre-judgment compensation was contrary to the new jurisprudence of Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT and, should, therefore be revised. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT rejected the application for revision, holding that the issuance of new jurisprudence by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT did not constitute a new fact.
Legal Principle(s)
The issuance of new jurisprudence by Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT is an issue of law and does not constitute a new fact.