Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that the Appellant had neither standing to challenge a decision which he alleged did not comply with the stipulations of his service contract nor the right to request the implementation of an arbitration procedure before Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT. However, Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT had committed an error in concluding that the Appellant had manifestly abused the process. The appeal was partially upheld and the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment partially vacated regarding the payment of USD 500.00 for abuse of procedure.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to renew his service contract. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT rejected the application for lack of jurisdiction and ordered the Applicant to pay USD 500. 00 for abuse of proceedings. The Applicant appealed.
Legal Principle(s)
A contractual clause in a service contract, regardless of whether it includes a material error, or whether it was made knowingly, cannot bestow upon Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT competencies that have not been provided by its Statute, another resolution of the General Assembly or similar legal instrument.