Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT Held or Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT Pronouncements
Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT considered that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT failed to show proper consideration for judicial economy and efficiency by choosing to proceed with a hearing on the merits of Mr Cooke¡¯s application in full knowledge of an appeal by the Secretary-General and ignoring the possibility that its judgment on Receivability might be reversed, as it was. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT held that when it determines that Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT improperly received an application and reverses or vacates a judgment on receivability, any judgment on the merits is null and void ab initio. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT clarified that this did not mean, however, that the judgment on the merits was automatically vacated; only Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT can vacate a judgment, upon application by a party. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµAT granted the Secretary-General¡¯s appeal and vacated the Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested his summary dismissal. Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT found for the Applicant.
Legal Principle(s)
When Ä¢¹½ÊÓÆµDT improperly receives an application and reverses or vacates a judgment on receivability, any judgment on the merits is null and void ab initio.